Meaning what exactly?
Weren't Toby and Kane injured for parts of the season we just had without us getting fudged by it?
Our top players are fantastic. There's not a club in the league that wouldn't drop significantly in quality from missing someone like Toby or Kane. I don't think our goal in the transfer market should be to somehow turn its into a club where that's not the case.
It's a well known fact that in the premier league you have to keep improving otherwise standing still will see you drop down the league. It's clear that we need cover in a few areas so why some people on this board are intent on sticking to what we've got, i simply don't agree.
Toby and Kane's injuries were bad as was Rose's but I'm talking season wrecking injuries which essentially rule a player out entirely, like Lamela I guess. I wouldn't say we've been lucky with injuries but we haven't been particularly unlucky with them. Son stepped up when Kane was out but can we expect to get away with poor cover up front and in defence for another season. I'd prefer not to risk it.
It's a well known fact that in the premier league you have to keep improving otherwise standing still will see you drop down the league. It's clear that we need cover in a few areas so why some people on this board are intent on sticking to what we've got, i simply don't agree.
Completely with you on this - I think you and I are in a minority though for some reason!! We haven't been unlucky with injuries at all - I'd add Eriksen, Lloris and possibly Dembele to Kane and TA as our list of players who we don't really have cover for....but thankfully none of them have picked up long term injuries.
On depth, as I said above, I think we're performing to the max of our potential/output based on our squad. If we want to complete in the CL and not slip down the PL, I think we need 4 additions this summer. There were many games last season when you looked at our bench and it was bare
Who do you think had a worse injury record than us this season, out of interest?
City & Utd
Who do you think had a worse injury record than us this season, out of interest?
Care to expand on that as I don't know who they have missed tbh
We missed our main striker for 9 (?) games, starting AM for the bulk of the season and starting CBs for a combined 13 games
League numbers only there btw
Once we went 3 at the back, I dont think Lamela would have started
Care to expand on that as I don't know who they have missed tbh
We missed our main striker for 9 (?) games, starting AM for the bulk of the season and starting CBs for a combined 13 games
League numbers only there btw
Utd had an awful season for injuries. Probably the worst in the league?
Liverpool probably about the same or certainly no better than us (off the top of my head) given that htey lost some important players like Lallana, Mane, Coutinho for periods
City were missing their one decent CB and captain for most of the season
Off the top of my head Kompany, Jesus and Gundogen missed key parts. All top players.
Utd barely had a first defence all season let alone Zlatan's end of season problems.
I don't know, who did United miss that makes their record worse than ours? I want to see some names and numbers of games missed that shows they were worse off than us if you are making the claim we werent unlucky with the injuries we had
Lallana 31
Firmino 31
Coutinho 35
Games played, no worse than our injuries? For reference Lamela played 9 games
Kompany is old and past it these days if that's who you are referring to for City
Was Jesus a starter for them when he was injured and wasn't Gundogen injured when they signed him?
They had more obviosubtema than anyone else IMO.Every team gets injuries and they effect teams differently dependent on the squad
United had plenty but have such an over sized squad and no actual obviosubtema you couldn't tell IMO
City lost their only decent dfender but he has been on the way down anyway. When you spend the money they have on centre backs one should be able to cover at least. Other than that they really didn't miss anyone important unless you include Jesus who joined in January and is still very much an unknown
Pool did lose players at varying points but their problem was and still is a pub defence where they didn't lose anyone that I remember (happy to be corrected)
Arse misses cazorla.... anyone else who was any good? They always seem to have a long list but it seems to be a player out for a very long time mainly
Chelsea strangely didn't lose any player for more than a game.... which was huge as towhy they won the league
More Covfefe tooThey had more obviosubtema than anyone else IMO.