-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
VAR: Sponsored by Chelsea
- Thread starter Gutter Boy
- Start date
jts1882
Edgar Davids
The simplest reform would be to go back to the original idea that VAR is to correct clear and obvious errors and get rid of the long reviews. If it is clear and obvious, then it should be possible to make the decision in 30s. If it takes multiple looks and slow motion then it isn't clear and obvious.
By analysing the minutia, it gives the impression that the correct decision will be made, when that is impossible when so many laws are subjective. Getting it wrong after five minutes undermines the whole system.
By analysing the minutia, it gives the impression that the correct decision will be made, when that is impossible when so many laws are subjective. Getting it wrong after five minutes undermines the whole system.
Baleforce
Terry Naylor
the problem is, that level of analysis is going to happen anyway, after the game, when people feel wronged they are going to be tinkled off
the only logical answer is to analyse the games to that level real time and make correct decisions, if the games take longer to complete, and the laws have to be changed to remove subjectivity, so be it
Robbo
Jack Jull
I think they should get rid of the individual VAR teams for each game.
Just have a massive VAR central with 20-30 refs, where each VAR call (from any game) is allocated to five random refs. They each get 30 seconds to make their verdict and can't consult or discuss with anyone else.
It would then require a majority of three or more refs for the decision to be overturned.
All decisions should then be stored in a publicly available database, for transparenty, which the press and public (and ideally the FA/PL) could use to reveal possible bias from different refs.
I think it could work.
Just have a massive VAR central with 20-30 refs, where each VAR call (from any game) is allocated to five random refs. They each get 30 seconds to make their verdict and can't consult or discuss with anyone else.
It would then require a majority of three or more refs for the decision to be overturned.
All decisions should then be stored in a publicly available database, for transparenty, which the press and public (and ideally the FA/PL) could use to reveal possible bias from different refs.
I think it could work.
K.D.D.D.D.Soc
Nayim
I like that, particularly the transparent element. Far too good a solution but there could be problems with the numbers of officials and the amount of decisions, we are told all goals are checked at present.
Robbo
Jack Jull
Yeah, you'd have to dimention the number of refs to games/possible decisions. With all the money in the game, it shouldn't really be an issue to train a sufficient number of refs to the highest level. Perhaps you could even have several VAR centrals, with decisions allocated to refs from all centrals?
It could work, which is exactly why it won't happen
....
Muttley
Mauricio Taricco
VAR survey - have your say! - Football Supporters' Association
We’re launching our second national VAR survey to gather the opinions of supporters in the Premier League about the continued implementation of the technology.thefsa.org.uk
I filled it in, but it definitely doesn't ask the key questions on fans minds in my opinion.