My guess is that the club could have called it earlier, but with so much expectation and so much riding on meeting the 15 Sept date, they have waited and waited until the last possible moment to concede defeat. If there was even the slightest chance of playing the Liverpool game at NWHL then they may have felt it was worth pushing the timing to the limit I personally don't have an issue with that. I am sure they have done everything possible to get us in there to the planned schedule. Yes it was very unfortunate that the delay leaked in the press first, but that's just a way of life these days when there are so many parties involved in a project.
I must admit I don't get all the anger from ST holders. People on twitter saying they didn't buy their season ticket for another season at Wembley. But are they saying that if we knowingly had a second season there, that they would not have renewed (thereby going to the back of the queue)? I suppose the only question is whether the 1/19 compensation for each Wembley game should be a refund rather than a credit. There are advantages to the club in the credit scheme, obviously. I don't have a problem with the credit scheme. Even if I didn't use it to buy match tickets (which I will) I could use it to offset next season's ST fee. But I imagine some people will resent the club keeping the money and will want a refund for each match that is switched to Wembley. However, I get that credit v refund is a genuine argument.
But all the pure anger, bile, hatred towards the club, Levy, Cullen, that's pouring out is incredible. We're getting a bloody fantastic new stadium. Being held back by a few games isn't going to change that. People need to get a grip.