This is the sort of wimpy, weasel-worded scribbling and whibbling I've come to expect from Dan 'Special' K.
Sixth paragraph he says "...but doubts remain about when it will be ready...".
Oh, yeah? Who's doubts? And what qualifications do they have to make such assessments?
We don't know because no one is actually quoted in the article. He tries to sound authoritative by throwing up numbers of workers and a speculated cost of the stadium, dates for this and that and all manner of people and procedures involved in the decision-making process.
But not once are we graced with the courtesy of an actual quote from a believable individual with something genuine to say about the subject.
What a tool, this grey-faced factless farce from Islington is. The only thing worse than being criticized in journalism is being ignored.