Could we not play home matches:
Arsenal, Chelsea, Emirates Marketing Project, Man U, Liverpool, (West Ham if not relegated by then) + say Saudi Sportswashing Machine, Everton, Sunderland, Aston Villa at Wembley
+ all of the others at Watford
for a season?
Would sell out for a NLD (well, maybe only 70k to Spurs fans but I say we allocate Arsenal 5k regardless , and although we would be woefully short for the Watford matches at least frequent use of a 90k stadium would satisfy general demand for the fans who a handful of times a year?
10 games at Wembley = about 800k home tickets a year.
Watford would allow about 15k home tickets, that's 150k league tickets a year.
Pretty much 1m home tickets in total.
Compare to 30k home tickets at WHL, about 600k home tickets a year.
Heck, could even drop to about 5 matches at Wembley and could sell the same number of tickets overall.
Not quite.
In addition to acquiring the non-core properties and financing the Phase 1 build, ENIC has supported the Club by way of an interest free, unsecured loan of £40m.
but would the beer still be ****??
Wouldn't it be fun to play scum at Wembley, but only give them 5,000 tickets because of 'safety concerns' ?
I think people put 2 and 2 together and come up with 5
I know Spurs go to Arsenal regular to see how their club level works and note their hospitality levels (which are amazing). With MK Dons as mentioned their ticket system is one that alot of clubs envy so hence that visit.
As I mentioned earlier, the two options are to remain and build round which will see a loss of initial revenue or hand over the ground to developers and go for broke which will mean a ground share. The club are weighing up time/cost/revenue loss.
Cool, 10% of what the stadium would cost. It's a start. But I await what lays beneath. I'll hold my hands up and say fair play, if ENIC come out of this with nothing other than an improved asset. Also, it should be the local council that should be gaining from cpo's and Tottenham only gaining through the stadium site.
£40m is £40m - a **** of a lot of money regardless of the percentage cost of the stadium that it represents. Don't knock it.
Didn't realise I had, Infact I never did.
what if we agree a deal to play the Arsanal, Chelski, Liverpool, Man Utd and Emirates Marketing Project games at Wembley and the rest at Milton Keynes??? Sounds like a Levy kinda a plan
Tottenham Wanderers: Spurs could play in Milton Keynes as they consider plan for season 'on the road'
EXCLUSIVE: stadiummk could be one of ‘Homes’ as Lane is rebuilt
04 April 2014
Tottenham are considering a radical plan to play an entire season ‘on the road’ while their new stadium at White Hart Lane is being built.
Wembley and the Olympic Stadium are in their thoughts as venues but, most interestingly, stadiummk in Milton Keynes is believed to be an option.
Spurs hope to be able to move into a 56,000-seat venue before the start of the 2017-18 season. During the previous campaign, they would like to stay at White Hart Lane while the stadium is being built but they are also weighing up other possibilities.
The initial view was that Tottenham would target a single stadium for their home fixtures during the 2016-17 campaign but Standard Sport understands they could opt for different grounds depending on the nature of their opponents.
Spurs chairman Levy Tottenham would seek to stage high-profile matches against the Premier League’s top clubs, such as Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester United, at Wembley or the Olympic Stadium. Games against teams with lesser appeal might take place at a smaller venue, with the home of League One club MK Dons thought to be in the running. The capacity of stadiummk will be increased to 32,000 in time for next year’s Rugby Union World Cup.
http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...ider-plan-for-season-on-the-road-9238087.html