• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand

Did you see how much the lovvies round there kicked off when they were going to build one crossrail station. I just can not believe Chelsea will get quick approval if they do it will be more proof to be that the prem is corrupt pretty much thought it was ever since the last game of the season when we tried to get the west ham game postponed but the league doctor would not leave his exec box at highbury.
Did you see how much the lovvies round there kicked off when they were going to build one crossrail station. I just can not believe Chelsea will get quick approval if they do it will be more proof to be that the prem is corrupt pretty much thought it was ever since the last game of the season when we tried to get the west ham game postponed but the league doctor would not leave his exec box at highbury.

I've read that somewhere else recently
 
Secretly funded by a Russian billionaire who owns a Club not too far from here....:rolleyes:

sullivan_gold_1807136c.jpg


gun__1382013066_kroenke_agm2013a.jpg



No shortage of candidates, really. :p
 
Apparently even now, once we have signed the 106 forms with the Council, someone could theoretically apply for a Judicial review

Presumably though for someone to do that, they would need to have some new information which hadn't previously been considered, or new reason why it shouldn't be allowed. A judicial review would simply happen just because, for example, some Arsenal fan wanted to delay it without any basis
 
Presumably though for someone to do that, they would need to have some new information which hadn't previously been considered, or new reason why it shouldn't be allowed. A judicial review would simply happen just because, for example, some Arsenal fan wanted to delay it without any basis

A judicial review is a review of the decision or how it has been reached. So you would need to demonstrate that the mayor or Haringey council had acted illegally. That is quite a high bar.
 
Apparently even now, once we have signed the 106 forms with the Council, someone could theoretically apply for a Judicial review
Every decision made by a public body is potentially susceptible to judicial review but such a challenge can only be on grounds of administrative error in terms of the lawfulness of the decision made. I wouldn't worry about it too much, in terms of planning decisions a claim must be brought within six weeks of a decision, for all other decisions there is a three month window. The JR period isn't an impediment to starting any work but there is some inherent risk until the period has passed.
 
The only potential judicial review is from EH on the derelict buildings.

Even if they submit one we won't need to down tools while we wait the several months for the court date, where their case would be laughed at and promptly thrown out.

When the basis for your decision is an independent body concluding that the retention of the buildings puts lives at risk, then that is that.
 
The only potential judicial review is from EH on the derelict buildings.

Even if they submit one we won't need to down tools while we wait the several months for the court date, where their case would be laughed at and promptly thrown out.

When the basis for your decision is an independent body concluding that the retention of the buildings puts lives at risk, then that is that.

So we can sign the S106 on Monday and then TNT the buildings straight away?
 
Back