This has always been part of the bigger scheme.I like the idea, don't like the execution.
But odd to build a state of the art £1bn stadium and then diminish it's impact with those.
It’s a shame they’re not on the north side. Detracts quite a bit, both the view of the stadium when coming up the high road and the view from the Sky Walk presumably.
But the revenue probably makes it worthwhile.
Are you saying the hotel is not going to change the view?Only if you are 200m in the air and can see over the buildings on the right hand side. Street level it only really impacts the view if you are walking along park lane.
I like the idea, don't like the execution.
But odd to build a state of the art £1bn stadium and then diminish it's impact with those.
Are you saying the hotel is not going to change the view?
View attachment 16934
(you'll say this is taken from Park Lane...but it's clearly going to affect the view from the High Road, as I said)
Are you saying the hotel is not going to change the view?
View attachment 16934
(you'll say this is taken from Park Lane...but it's clearly going to affect the view from the High Road, as I said)
Few different angles
I think it looks decent TBH, yes the view of the stadium is obscured but from one side, if you are a regular visitor how many times do you need to see one specific angle to get your fill.
Unlike the current uproar the moneys already aside for this as per the original planning so doesn't impact future finances available to transfers, thankfully.
All in all another win for the club and the local area which desperately needs accommodation options
Few different angles
That looks like the hilton/apartment building in deans gate Manchester.
Quite a few of the older utd players own flats there, Neville, Scholes and the like
More importantly jobs.
The manc one is touted as quite posh, though it isn't all that. They have the "sky bar" that's got decent views but is pretty naff imo, at one point was quite a difficult to get into, don't know about now though.Likely end up being a version of Hilton or Accor TBF, the club won't run it, someone else will
Not ugly, just not suitable. To my eye anyway.Absolutely. The bigger picture in all this
Also its not Fugly as mentioned earlier, far from it.
Likely end up being a version of Hilton or Accor TBF, the club won't run it, someone else will
It's classic 'small rooster so here's my substitute phallic' design.Also its not Fugly as mentioned earlier, far from it.
ENIC company Mitchells and Butlers do already have their own chain of hotels - Innkeepers Lodge they are called: https://www.mbplc.com/our-brands/innkeepers-collection/
It's classic 'small rooster so here's my substitute phallic' design.