glorygloryeze
Tom Huddlestone
Re: Tim Sherwood - Head Coach
To be fair to Maltese, I think he is basically saying that when Sherwood found/stumbled upon a winning formula against Manure, instead of realising why it worked against them and that Arsenal are a difference proposition who have different strengths and weaknesses, he just thought 'i'll just do the same'.
It looked a bit like when Harry beat Arsenal in April 2010 and then thought 'oh well, i'll just do the same' again a year later - not realising why it worked in April 2010 (Arsenal lacked shooting capability from distance, we had greater aerial supremacy in deeper areas) and why it would NOT work again in April 2011 (they had pace on the break, more strength in CM against Modric and Hudd, and we were minus Ledley beside Dawson). It was the kind of roll-the-dice-and see-what-works approach that Harry often tried that I think he's talking about.
To Harry's credit in April 2011 he changed things at Half-time and we really in the end should have won, but the first half foolish tactics (which anyone could see a mile off) that gave us too much work to do.
I think Maltese basically says Tim did the same yesterday: not realised what worked vs Manure and why it wouldn't likely work against Arsenal (who have more numbers in midfield and a far far better one).
A fair and worrying point imo
We can't have it both ways as fans. We can't blame Sherwood entirely for yesterday and give him no credit for Man United.
The strategy at United was sound, and it worked. That's down to Tim as much as it is down to our players carrying it out and United players playing poorly. We have to be fair and give credit where it's due.
To be fair to Maltese, I think he is basically saying that when Sherwood found/stumbled upon a winning formula against Manure, instead of realising why it worked against them and that Arsenal are a difference proposition who have different strengths and weaknesses, he just thought 'i'll just do the same'.
It looked a bit like when Harry beat Arsenal in April 2010 and then thought 'oh well, i'll just do the same' again a year later - not realising why it worked in April 2010 (Arsenal lacked shooting capability from distance, we had greater aerial supremacy in deeper areas) and why it would NOT work again in April 2011 (they had pace on the break, more strength in CM against Modric and Hudd, and we were minus Ledley beside Dawson). It was the kind of roll-the-dice-and see-what-works approach that Harry often tried that I think he's talking about.
To Harry's credit in April 2011 he changed things at Half-time and we really in the end should have won, but the first half foolish tactics (which anyone could see a mile off) that gave us too much work to do.
I think Maltese basically says Tim did the same yesterday: not realised what worked vs Manure and why it wouldn't likely work against Arsenal (who have more numbers in midfield and a far far better one).
A fair and worrying point imo
Last edited: