• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*** The Official 'How do you stop Emirates Marketing Project?!?!' OMT ***

africanspurs said:
sorry bro but its true...they are pegging us down the inside channel of rose and the count

in his defense.....the whole team is getting mauled though

the partnership between him and dawson is lacking.......i think its more to do with him that dawson
Click to expand...
Look the way I see it it's the DMs fault on the goal. A guy from midfield comes with the ball without any interference. He's allowed to come until he gets to the box. The closest CB has to intercept him, otherwise he would be clear on goal. Vlad did what anybody would do if he was closest to the guy with the ball charging into the box. The opponent passes the ball and Dawson is to far away to cover the only striker available. If it was on Dawson's part of the field it would be the same conclusion, Dawson would need to intercept the solo on coming man with the ball. There is no excuses for the DMs to let a guy charge from the midfielder area solo towards the box.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back