We've never had a discussion on what our positions are on things before recording and that the first time we know what someone is going to say is when they say it. Our responses are immediate and genuine.
That means we occasionally kick ourselves about something we should've said afterwards or could've said better but the plus side is that it is spontaneous and authentic.
I think that disagreements will happen naturally, we've already had a few, but I'm not keen on disagreement for the sake of it.
Yes, I felt that too; of course it is super hard to paint positives with the current "playing style" and feel around the team.
Steff is a good host BUT also has pretty much the strongest views on this forum in terms of Poch and Mou, so he would struggle to take a credible neutral view on those topics.
Probably Milo is the more balanced 'neutral' voice who could play devil's advocate?
PS I agree about the Poch revisionism, we endured a dreadfully depressing final year of falling apart.
Yes you are.but I'm not keen on disagreement for the sake of it.
Yes you are.
You clam. You, me and my gran. Outside now.fudge you. Either this man is dropped from the pod or I'm never doing it again
good to see you are already on the corporate sponsorship gravy train, how many jars did they give you?
Are you referring to the Marmite point or Fat Sam's bleeds Bovril?
The Bovril, I've not listened to this one yet
The Bovril, I've not listened to this one yet
I hope that you've got a strong stomach.