Bullet
Andy Thompson
I just watched a film on my Amazon Fire TV Stick Prime membership dongle doo-dah called The Corporation.
In it they paint a bleak picture of the future of humanity and describe at length how corporations have grown and grown in power, they are now multi-national so are more powerful than individual governments.
Most of them use slave labour or massively pollute the environment or plunder resources or collude with governments to do terrible things. Going back to IBM and their alleged collusion with nazis to process those sent to concentration / death camps and various examples through to the present day.
The fundamental "problem" or cause being that corporations have a responsibility to the shareholders to make money. Even if the CEO is a good person who would like to reduce the bad things and increase the good things, they have to do what gleans most money for the shareholders, that is their job.
They had the CEO of big companies admitting this and saying they worry about the world and would like to good but that isn't their job and implying they would be sacked if they did.
I'm not a hippy, I've never been on a rally and probably never will. I am a normal bloke, drive a big car, don't particularly care about these issues more than you do.
But it made me wonder if there is a ranked list of companies, in order of some crude measure of goodness/badness so I can choose where to shop i.e. we all know allegedly Coke do bad things, and GAP, and IBM, and ... well most corporations really... so who do I choose? Starbucks get pelters for not paying tax, loads of companies use slave labour... is there a website that gives me a simple listing?
The upshot of this seemed to be that corporations would continue to act in this way (as that is how they are designed and set up) unless either (1) customers stopped using the worst offenders so corporations had to change tack to gain back sales or (2) pollution etc was somehow a commodity which could be traded, so you are allowed to pump 200 units of sulphur dioxide into the environment as that is the inevitable outcome of your business, but you have to buy the right to do it and can trade those stocks on the stock market somehow, so that pollution was all part of the CEO's job to control for shareholders.
In it they paint a bleak picture of the future of humanity and describe at length how corporations have grown and grown in power, they are now multi-national so are more powerful than individual governments.
Most of them use slave labour or massively pollute the environment or plunder resources or collude with governments to do terrible things. Going back to IBM and their alleged collusion with nazis to process those sent to concentration / death camps and various examples through to the present day.
The fundamental "problem" or cause being that corporations have a responsibility to the shareholders to make money. Even if the CEO is a good person who would like to reduce the bad things and increase the good things, they have to do what gleans most money for the shareholders, that is their job.
They had the CEO of big companies admitting this and saying they worry about the world and would like to good but that isn't their job and implying they would be sacked if they did.
I'm not a hippy, I've never been on a rally and probably never will. I am a normal bloke, drive a big car, don't particularly care about these issues more than you do.
But it made me wonder if there is a ranked list of companies, in order of some crude measure of goodness/badness so I can choose where to shop i.e. we all know allegedly Coke do bad things, and GAP, and IBM, and ... well most corporations really... so who do I choose? Starbucks get pelters for not paying tax, loads of companies use slave labour... is there a website that gives me a simple listing?
The upshot of this seemed to be that corporations would continue to act in this way (as that is how they are designed and set up) unless either (1) customers stopped using the worst offenders so corporations had to change tack to gain back sales or (2) pollution etc was somehow a commodity which could be traded, so you are allowed to pump 200 units of sulphur dioxide into the environment as that is the inevitable outcome of your business, but you have to buy the right to do it and can trade those stocks on the stock market somehow, so that pollution was all part of the CEO's job to control for shareholders.