mephitis
Niko Kranjcar
is it just me - i still don't get it.
I know, it's taken nearly 3 years
is it just me - i still don't get it.
Good business for us. Shame it didn't work out, now lets move on.
I’m not much of a businessman, can you explain how our all time club record signing leaving on loan is good business?
Edit - Talk of drawing a line under this or moving on...Tanguy has gone on loan, he is still our problem.
Glad it's over, but it'll always be a great shame he didn't leave earlier.
Compared to him staying, collecting wages and not playing, it's excellent business. Presuming he does leave permanently, of course.
Buying him in the first place...poor business, in hindsight.
Nobody was buying him so getting him out on loan with a potential sale at the end of it was the best outcome we could've gotIt’s a step in the right direction for all parties if he can get back to enjoying his football no doubt, better to try something rather than do nothing.
It’s not that I don’t see the potential positives but like with a few others, loans for players we’ve spent big on doesn’t scream “We know what we’re doing financially” to me..
Nobody was buying him so getting him out on loan with a potential sale at the end of it was the best outcome we could've got
I can only assume we've barely paid any of the agreed fees and bonuses yet and if they want to keep him then it's just a write off...
Bugger! I was settled into disliking him.
http://sportwitness.co.uk/rare-player-pay-tottenham-chunk-salary-going-forward/I read it as he was so desperate to leave that he just took a pay cut?
http://sportwitness.co.uk/rare-player-pay-tottenham-chunk-salary-going-forward/
Today’s edition of L’Equipe has comments from Vincent Ponsot, the French club’s director of football, in which he praised the efforts put in by the Spurs owned player to return to the Groupama Stadium.
“It is a loan with loan indemnity, which is based on the partial support of the capital part of the transfer,” Ponsot said. “But, above all, on the part of Tanguy, there were not only words. He was decisive and it is very rare in this area. He is one of the players who is not economically accessible, but he did everything to be [here]. Often, we have words without the facts on the contracts. We did our part, we needed a supplement and he was the one who provided it. There, there were facts in front of words.”
The newspaper claims Lyon were not able to meet the salary demands set by Conte’s side to take Ndombele on a loan deal. L’Equipe state the player ‘will himself pay Tottenham’ the difference in salary between what Tottenham demanded and what Lyon are paying to him.