• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Stones tickets

In 1977 we had ticket touts....now illegal, apparently. Seems that Ebay has become the new 'centralised' ticket tout.
Ticket touting is only illegal in football. There was a report on my local news the other day about the instant re-sale, at great markup, of tickets for the first England v Australia Test at Trent Bridge next year, they said that wasn't illegal for cricket either.

Not that I agree with the practice, but there it is.
 
Scandalous that the biggest bands can charge such extorniate fees, like they need the money! Then again, nobody forces you to pay the money. I go to less gigs than I used to these days as I'd rather pay decent money and go to the theatre or a sporting event and have the choice of sitting down rather than paying £100+ to stand in an arena and dodge beer/tinkle that tossers feel the need to launch in the air.

Feel like an old git having read what I have just written.
 
I still regret to this day I decision I made nearly sixteen years ago (not life changing but could have been a great personal landmark in our married life), was in New York in about 1997, I'd taken my wife shopping in the New Year sales as her Chrimbo present, the concierge in our hotel had a pair of tickets to see the Rolling Stones at Madison Square Garden on the Saturday night and was only asking $35, wasn't the missus' cup o' tea and it was her weekend so we passed them up. :( Still, at least she let me visit Grand Central Station. :)
 
The extortionate prices for concerts means I don't give two bricks about not paying for their music (which is why the concerts got expensive in the first place).
 
Gordy,

Don't worry. They haven't been great in concert for about 30 years (82 was perhaps the last time)...

General comment now...

...they serve their purpose, which is to be a live canvas off which people can bounce their memories or dreams off. Jagger is a great performer and remarkably fit, but he's now a caricature of himself, a cliche...Keef is half the man he was and Watts will always be Watts; calm, cool, collected and consistent. Wood? Well, hmmm, I cannot take him seriously in that sense.

I think snatches of their new album are excellent cover versions of old Rolling Stones classics...last time I saw them was 2005 and I was not impressed. Last time I saw Jagger live was 2009 and he was like Joel Grey in Cabaret. Only worth three hundred knicker if you want to say you've seen them or have memories to project off them. if you're going expecting to see The Rolling Stones as you've heard about them, well, not really...

..
 
The Beatles
The Kinks
Pink Floyd
The Who
Jimi Hendrix
Led Zeppelin
Black Sabbath
Kings of Leon
Oasis
The Verve
Hip Hop 1985-2000
Motown
Morcheeba
Massive Attack
Drum and Bass 1994-2000

I could go on.......just not these guys, they should have the good grace to fudge off......it's like your grandad doinga porn film. Not appropriate.

Out of interest would you go and see The Who or Pink Floyd (if PF were to reform) live, as they're from the same generation, sorry no pun intended
 
The Beatles
The Kinks
Pink Floyd
The Who
Jimi Hendrix
Led Zeppelin
Black Sabbath
Kings of Leon
Oasis
The Verve
Hip Hop 1985-2000
Motown
Morcheeba
Massive Attack
Drum and Bass 1994-2000

I could go on.......just not these guys, they should have the good grace to fudge off......it's like your grandad doinga porn film. Not appropriate.

You're listing Morcheeba, Massive Attack and drum and bass on there and you have the gall to say the Stones are brick. Oh dear, people who live in glass houses and all that...
 
Scandalous that the biggest bands can charge such extorniate fees, like they need the money! Then again, nobody forces you to pay the money. I go to less gigs than I used to these days as I'd rather pay decent money and go to the theatre or a sporting event and have the choice of sitting down rather than paying £100+ to stand in an arena and dodge beer/tinkle that tossers feel the need to launch in the air.

Feel like an old git having read what I have just written.
erm.... you have the choice to sit down at gigs as well.
 
The extortionate prices for concerts means I don't give two bricks about not paying for their music (which is why the concerts got expensive in the first place).

One of the big stars (Madonna?) has commented that the only big money from music now is from touring because of downloading music.

Not sure about the correlation, though. If there was no downloaded pirated music, I suspect the concert tickets would still be high. Likewise if concerts were cheap, people would still download.
 
I read keef's autobiog and I didn't like the cut of his jib, at all.

An utter c***.


I thought so as well, driving round at 100mph skagged up with a pregnant wide, kid in the back etc. Stole his best mates birds as well, even if he was being a **** to her
 
One of the big stars (Madonna?) has commented that the only big money from music now is from touring because of downloading music.

Not sure about the correlation, though. If there was no downloaded pirated music, I suspect the concert tickets would still be high. Likewise if concerts were cheap, people would still download.

Lol!! Artists are making more money than ever. Downloads are higher than record sales aren't they?
 
Lol!! Artists are making more money than ever. Downloads are higher than record sales aren't they?

The biggest artists now make most of their money from live shows and merchandise. Album/download sales are not nearly what they were in the 90s, indeed, the common complaint you'll hear amidst the big artists is that iTunes rewrote the rules with regards to pricing and have effectively become the single biggest record label in the world (labels themselves do not have a quarter of the power they had). Further, they have changed the way people listen to music, thus often, people will only buy a few tracks from a new album. This opens up a far bigger discussion with regards to what mp3 has done to the 'art' of writing music/making an album (it's done a lot)... Of course they're not hurting, as the biggest bands can re-work their deals with labels or perhaps choose to simply have a distributor/their own labels, something which is happening with increasing frequency.

It's incredible how entertainment endures recession, but I will also say, the next time someone questions major tour ticket prices, I'd be happy to breakdown how much it costs for a major production (video screens, proper stage, proper sound, proper lights) to move from venue to venue per week. Put it this way; think of the petrol prices alone...
 
...without going on too much, it is one of the main reasons that solely stealing music from the internet will kill music in the long run. In fact, might be worth a seperate thread if anyone's interested in discussing? I am very passionate about it. I DO think there are situations where taking music from online is justified i.e. if you've tried to buy physical and online copies of a title and cannot find them anywhere, or if you already own the album but don't have a burner, but otherwise? Hmmm.
 
Yep. Still power with the artists rather than record companies is good IMO.


I agree that in many ways it has been a great thing. The labels were crooks in their own right, and it's certainly far better now that they don't have the monopolies they had. Where a lot of labels blew it was not keeping up. Many bands did not have digital rights written into their contracts, thus when the internet/mp3 broke, it was a bit of a wild west scramble for a while as everyone tried to figure out how to deal with the income.

The only thing which isn't good about seeing labels de-stabilized is that many smaller bands now suffer because there is no-one to give them a leg up/seed money. The average person doesn't have the time or inclination to stray beyond a dozen or so web sites, thus it becomes a case of marketing to attract attention still...such a huge conversation really, there are so many angles and perspectives.
 
Back