Sick sick world what is wrong with people

[Silly McSilly Face]

Weapons grade bs!

She was doing a three point turn and turning away from the officer. She was doing less than 5 miles per hour and clearly did not drive straight at him ( his own footage demonstrates she was turning right not driving straight at him ).

The only time the car accelerated was after she’d been shot at 3 times including being shot in the head. She was unconscious/dead at that point.

Let’s have a look what the lefty lib tards at the times (owned by Rupert Murdoch) think.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

You call weapons grade bs on someone and then state as fact that the car was going less than 5 mph. Most cars really struggle to do less than 5 mph under any degree of pedal input. She reverses back pretty sharply when the agent goes for the door and when she goes forward the agent with the hand on the door ends up running as they let go with the momentum. She was likely doing significantly more than 5 mph as she meets the agent that fired and as you can see the car pelt down the street afterwards its pretty clear that she floored it. In terms of "3 point turn" car goes backwards then forwards and to the right. Thats not a 3 point turn

 

[Crab.C.Nesbitt]

You call weapons grade bs on someone and then state as fact that the car was going less than 5 mph. Most cars really struggle to do less than 5 mph under any degree of pedal input. She reverses back pretty sharply when the agent goes for the door and when she goes forward the agent with the hand on the door ends up running as they let go with the momentum. She was likely doing significantly more than 5 mph as she meets the agent that fired and as you can see the car pelt down the street afterwards its pretty clear that she floored it. In terms of "3 point turn" car goes backwards then forwards and to the right. Thats not a 3 point turn

Errr do you have a driving license mate? Even if you do I think you should get some more lessons!

Ohhhh nooo did the poor little ice agent have to remove his hand from the door handle? Hope the little petal is ok!

The only point at which the car accelerated out of control was after the driver had been shot.

And the shooter was not struck by the car if she was going at significantly more than 5 mph otherwise the shooter would not have been seen calmly walking away from the scene with not even the slightest sign of an injury or even any collision.

 

[MartyFunkhouser]

Errr do you have a driving license mate? Even if you do I think you should get some more lessons!

Ohhhh nooo did the poor little ice agent have to remove his hand from the door handle? Hope the little petal is ok!

The only point at which the car accelerated out of control was after the driver had been shot.

And the shooter was not struck by the car if she was going at significantly more than 5 mph otherwise the shooter would not have been seen calmly walking away from the scene with not even the slightest sign of an injury or even any collision.

Yeh, im definitely trusting these

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

And it seems there is form for terrible execution of tactics.


The car was literally stationary at time of engagement, literally everything ive read is saying their engagement was off piste of any training and they inflamed the situation.

People making it political rather than rational is the issue here, the fact people are even including brick about her being a lefty shows that.

I will stick with the veterans, experts and those with actual training.

 

[Silly McSilly Face]

Errr do you have a driving license mate? Even if you do I think you should get some more lessons!

Ohhhh nooo did the poor little ice agent have to remove his hand from the door handle? Hope the little petal is ok!

The only point at which the car accelerated out of control was after the driver had been shot.

And the shooter was not struck by the car if she was going at significantly more than 5 mph otherwise the shooter would not have been seen calmly walking away from the scene with not even the slightest sign of an injury or even any collision.

Next time you get in the car have a think about what your foot is doing to keep the car under 5 mph and look around you at how things look at that speed and then compare it to how the vehicle in that footage behaves right from the start.

 

[Lost Mango]

Don't worry too hard. Genetics is partly random so your children may end up more evolved. Or maybe theirs.

No such thing, scientifically, as 'more evolved'.

It doesn't have a direction or destination so has no 'relativity'

 

[Crab.C.Nesbitt]

Next time you get in the car have a think about what your foot is doing to keep the car under 5 mph and look around you at how things look at that speed and then compare it to how the vehicle in that footage behaves right from the start.

If you’re parking your car at 5mph plus, eg in of those private pay and display car parks with small spaces then you are going to have a colllision at some point.

 

[Silly McSilly Face]

If you’re parking your car at 5mph plus, eg in of those private pay and display car parks with small spaces then you are going to have a colllision at some point.

When you're reversing into one of those spaces you're using the brake to keep the car's own momentum to a reasonable speed most of the time.

 

[MartyFunkhouser]

Errr do you have a driving license mate? Even if you do I think you should get some more lessons!

Ohhhh nooo did the poor little ice agent have to remove his hand from the door handle? Hope the little petal is ok!

The only point at which the car accelerated out of control was after the driver had been shot.

And the shooter was not struck by the car if she was going at significantly more than 5 mph otherwise the shooter would not have been seen calmly walking away from the scene with not even the slightest sign of an injury or even any collision.

Apparently its a known reaction that if someone's foot is on the accelerator at impact of being shot then the speed increases initially until they hit something. If that was the case here, the fact the agent managed to avoid the car wasn't down to him shooting the victim, that likely exasperates the speed, therefore the idea a stationary car would be deemed a lethal threat at the point, when he was able to move out the way (also quoted by several ex agents) seems ridiculous. Again, he has failed the first rule of approaching a car with a driver sat behind the wheel with the ignition turned on, you don't stand in front of it as you are putting yourself in danger.

 

[Crab.C.Nesbitt]

When you're reversing into one of those spaces you're using the brake to keep the car's own momentum to a reasonable speed most of the time.

I’m certainly not driving at 5mph+ when I’m reversing in

 

[Silly McSilly Face]

I’m certainly not driving at 5mph+ when I’m reversing in

Neither am I

 

[Gilzeantoscore]

He can't see where she's steeeing in a split second. Fact car ended up going right is irrelevant to his decision. He reaches for the gun before the car turns.

Of course he does because he's a fascist cowboy, who wanted to shoot somebody! So I guess intent means nothing, to justify murder the test is just if the gunman thought something was about to happen. Sick, sick, sick!

 

[Silly McSilly Face]

Of course he does because he's a fascist cowboy, who wanted to shoot somebody! So I guess intent means nothing, to justify murder the test is just if the gunman thought something was about to happen. Sick, sick, sick!

But that is the test in law. You think it is sick but that is what it is, at least here in the UK. Criminal law in UK requires two elements, the actus reas (the action) and the mens rea (mental state/intention - whether there is a "guilty mind"). For a police shooting in this situation, the examination of the mens rea is exactly about whether the officer reasonably believed that something was about to happen. I'm not in depth familiar with US standards but i doubt its a million miles removed.

 

[LutonSpurs]

But that is the test in law. You think it is sick but that is what it is, at least here in the UK. Criminal law in UK requires two elements, the actus reas (the action) and the mens rea (mental state/intention - whether there is a "guilty mind"). For a police shooting in this situation, the examination of the mens rea is exactly about whether the officer reasonably believed that something was about to happen. I'm not in depth familiar with US standards but i doubt its a million miles removed.

You are not familiar with a topic lol. Google it like you do with all the other stuff you claim expertise in, you massive charlatan.

 

[MartyFunkhouser]

Of course he does because he's a fascist cowboy, who wanted to shoot somebody! So I guess intent means nothing, to justify murder the test is just if the gunman thought something was about to happen. Sick, sick, sick!

The DOJ mandate is thats officers must attempt to move out the way rather than firing their weapon. Despite even my own prejudice views of trigger happy America, ive been pleasantly surprised at how many trained humans have condemned the killing, not on politics but on actions. Lack of actions and lack of planning. Surprised also at how little support there is legally for shooting at moving vehicles in America, I thought it was much more loose, apparently not.

 

[Silly McSilly Face]

You are not familiar with a topic lol. Google it like you do with all the other stuff you claim expertise in, you massive charlatan.

where have i ever claimed expertise in a topic?

 

[LutonSpurs]

where have i ever claimed expertise in a topic?

Every time you type with the confidence of an expert and the accuracy of a broken lens.

 

[Silly McSilly Face]

Every time you type with the confidence of an expert and the accuracy of a broken lens.

Another one on the ignore list

 

[LutonSpurs]

Another one on the ignore list

Awwwwww devastated. And you won't be able to help yourself Silly. But I admire your intentions.

 

[LutonSpurs]

So is Elon Musk getting the ire of the right wingers for allowing his app to undress kids? Or is that the kind of noncery some of you don't care about?