• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Sick sick world what is wrong with people

Danishfurniturelover said:
The traveller community offer no benfit to this country whatsoever and should all be kicked out and or their lives made a living hell through police harassment till they pay back all the tax they owe.

I have an Irish wife and all her family hate them as much as i do.

But due to the perversely ultra liberal society we live in where the are so many charity and special interest groups set up to "look" after them it will never happen.

Liberalism when protecting the rights of homesexuals and ethnic minorities is brilliant but when looking after criminal scum it is not.
Click to expand...

No surprise that this roosterpiece is all over them

upload_2020-7-25_12-44-46.png
 
markysimmo said:
No surprise that this roosterpiece is all over them

View attachment 9039
Click to expand...

I would rather Lammy then him and that's saying something.


Problem has been ever since Bliar back in 2003 read the report that said if a 1000 people emigrate into the uk 100 of them will be politically active and of that 100, 95 will vote labour.

It was a move designed at strengthening his voter base, which resulted in weakening its core base and ending in the massively polarised country we have today.

Some people hate Thatcher but Bliar did more to hurt the country than she ever did.
 
Parklaner81 said:
Absolutely sickening. Did that occur after the verdict? The judge should haul them back in & increase their sentences to the maximum possible level (no idea whether that's actually possible, but anyway...)

Scum.
Click to expand...
I think they were cleared of murder in that trial, and have now been found guilty of manslaughter the other day. The trial has been delayed because of various things, covid, juror intimidation etc.

Tragic case, and although I don't know all the details, I'd be hard pressed to find them guilty of murder, even if I do think they are toe rag scum.
 
Gilzeantoscore said:
Hyperbole much? Yet there is nothing to see with Boris and his competence. How many British dead now. Stroll on.
Click to expand...

Big big questions need to be asked of him. I did a shift at B&Q this morning. Every customer was wearing a mask to be fair as were all of us staff. But we should have followed the asians and done it straight away in February.

He has other important questions to answer,i can sort of forgive being slow to react but once this turned out to be the big one the government's performance has been very lax and Johnson has basically treated it like a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DTA
ricky2tricky4city said:
I think they were cleared of murder in that trial, and have now been found guilty of manslaughter the other day. The trial has been delayed because of various things, covid, juror intimidation etc.

Tragic case, and although I don't know all the details, I'd be hard pressed to find them guilty of murder, even if I do think they are toe rag scum.
Click to expand...

Yeah I wasn't referring to the murder/manslaughter debate. More that any human being who is capable of behaving in the manner that video clip suggests after being responsible for someone else's death, deserves no leniency whatsoever from the justice system in my opinion (that's also assuming they won't already receive the maximum possible sentence for the crime they were convicted of, something I'm not sure of but highly doubt).
 
ricky2tricky4city said:
I think they were cleared of murder in that trial, and have now been found guilty of manslaughter the other day. The trial has been delayed because of various things, covid, juror intimidation etc.

Tragic case, and although I don't know all the details, I'd be hard pressed to find them guilty of murder, even if I do think they are toe rag scum.
Click to expand...

I get it murder is premeditated and they went out that evening to steal not kill. Guess how i would have voted anyway if i was on the jury....


Till we start cracking down on scum they will get worse and worse, my nearest biggish town a 12 year old boy hit a female police officer in the head while being goaded on by 15 other chavs. Shoreham by Sea it was in the national news.

When things like this get worse and worse the general public get more and more fed up with it they then end up voting for a true nutter like Trump.

I moan about politicians from all parties but till a tough line is taken on crime we risk going down that road.
 
markysimmo said:
Shaun Bailey will make a far better mayor than the idiot Khan ever could be
Knife crime is worse than ever, he has pretty much managed to bankrupt TFL, the bloke should be removed from office
Click to expand...

We get all kinds of idiots defending Khan but his performance has been shambolic. His lack of leadership is the largest concern and his arrogance in the City Hall meetings is insane, I’ve never seen any thing like it and I’ve been in boardroom meetings with company owners in Dubai who answer to no one who show less arrogance.

His idea of leadership is “it’s not my fault” and telling criminals in London you can continue your crime wave because it’s going to take 10 years to solve the issues. Where he should be a strong Major of one of the worlds most important capitals and promote a tough line on crime. But it’s ok, it’s all part of living in a big city
 
Parklaner81 said:
Yeah I wasn't referring to the murder/manslaughter debate. More that any human being who is capable of behaving in the manner that video clip suggests after being responsible for someone else's death, deserves no leniency whatsoever from the justice system in my opinion (that's also assuming they won't already receive the maximum possible sentence for the crime they were convicted of, something I'm not sure of but highly doubt).
Click to expand...
Think I misread slightly what you were saying mate.

I thought those pictures were after they were first cleared of murder BUT apparently not, I share your sentiments.
 
Danishfurniturelover said:
I get it murder is premeditated and they went out that evening to steal not kill. Guess how i would have voted anyway if i was on the jury....


Till we start cracking down on scum they will get worse and worse, my nearest biggish town a 12 year old boy hit a female police officer in the head while being goaded on by 15 other chavs. Shoreham by Sea it was in the national news.

When things like this get worse and worse the general public get more and more fed up with it they then end up voting for a true nutter like Trump.

I moan about politicians from all parties but till a tough line is taken on crime we risk going down that road.
Click to expand...


Could not agree more we have gone soft on yobs who get away with murder/ mayham. The courts are full of lilly livered social workers and bleeding heart liberals who whine that their clients never had a chance because ( enter here all their excuses).
 
Danishfurniturelover said:
The traveller community offer no benfit to this country whatsoever and should all be kicked out and or their lives made a living hell through police harassment till they pay back all the tax they owe.

I have an Irish wife and all her family hate them as much as i do.

But due to the perversely ultra liberal society we live in where the are so many charity and special interest groups set up to "look" after them it will never happen.

Liberalism when protecting the rights of homesexuals and ethnic minorities is brilliant but when looking after criminal scum it is not.
Click to expand...
It's an interesting philosophical point (at least to me after a few Lagavulins, anyway).

If a group of people choose not to be a part of society, should they be afforded the protections and privileges that come with being a part of it? We cover them with the protection of a fair trial, a jury trial, I suspect a public defender, etc. They're covered by the same sentencing guidelines and treatment that any other criminal would be.

Does it make sense as a society to offer that for nothing in return?
 
scaramanga said:
It's an interesting philosophical point (at least to me after a few Lagavulins, anyway).

If a group of people choose not to be a part of society, should they be afforded the protections and privileges that come with being a part of it? We cover them with the protection of a fair trial, a jury trial, I suspect a public defender, etc. They're covered by the same sentencing guidelines and treatment that any other criminal would be.

Does it make sense as a society to offer that for nothing in return?
Click to expand...

They get afforded substantial rights As seen when their illegal camps harass tax paying communities and get a free run due to red tape laws.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back