milo
Jack L. Jones
What happened to Pallaciios in his private life is very very sad and I have every sympathy for him. However, his form had gome long before the tradegy struck.
Form fluctuates. Palacios was a good signing, we needed steel in midfield when Harry came in and he provided it. He is one of, if not, the main reason why we stayed up. I think that most people on here would accept that the long term loss of form that Palacios suffered can be traced back to his brother's murder. The story of him waiting in the hotel for Harry to wake up, in order to get permission to go to Honduras is heartbreaking. Distorting this to support a very weak argument is really low.
There was a quote from Harry when he took over (which annoyingly I cannot find) where he said that he knew how to beat Tottenham and he was going to address the areas that he would target as an opposition manager. He did that. It does not matter whether Palacios, Defoe, Crouch or Kranjcar etc. were part of our long term plans, they moved us forward and (have mainly) been shipped on before they became a burden or deadwood. Most of the deadwood at the club pre-dates Harry's tenure and is the result of our wonderful, forward looking, directors of football.
Starting with a position, disregarding anything that contradicts it and exaggerating or distorting anything that you think supports your pre-disposed position is no way to win an argument, it just makes you look a little odd. There are plenty of respected posters on here who do not support Redknapp, they make their arguments well, back them up with evidence and acknowledge when someone who disagrees with them makes a good point. I would suggest that you read some of what they write and try and be a little more like them. You will get people's backs up less and be listened to more.