• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Radu Dragusin

Surfless said:
And the award for most patronising post 2024 goes to.....

You're throwing around woke gen z terminology to a bunch of footy fans who via the interweb have known each other long enough to feel comfortable we don't have any raging XXXphobes in our midst. We do have a tamed sociopath called Gutterboy, but that aside we're an easy going bunch of Tottenham supporters.

How about dialling it back a touch?
Click to expand...
It is a bit early in 2024 to be giving out the awards. Just saying.

Maybe I should let sleeping dogs lie
 
Gutter Boy said:
Since 4 at the back came in in the 60s, 5 and 6 have been the CBs, 4 and 8 the CMs.

I agree it's not about shirts per se, it's more people calling DMs a #6, rather than a #4 that grates.
Click to expand...

I cant see the point of numbers, as I understand it they were used to identify players to spectators, now with their name on shirts they seem redundant. Over the last 30 years players have numbers which don't relate to positions, they now seem a gimmick for experts to use in their hot hair.
 
Gutter Boy said:
Since 4 at the back came in in the 60s, 5 and 6 have been the CBs, 4 and 8 the CMs.

I agree it's not about shirts per se, it's more people calling DMs a #6, rather than a #4 that grates.
Click to expand...
Don't get me started...it's definitely one of my biggest irritations with modern football (and I have a few!). Though us and Liverpool historically might have had a #5 in midfield too. pre squad numbers which obviously distorted this further Clough at Forest liked a #6 in midfield (Hodge or Keane) but it was really always #5 and #6 at the back.
 
GPRD81 said:
Don't get me started...it's definitely one of my biggest irritations with modern football (and I have a few!). Though us and Liverpool historically might have had a #5 in midfield too. pre squad numbers which obviously distorted this further Clough at Forest liked a #6 in midfield (Hodge or Keane) but it was really always #5 and #6 at the back.
Click to expand...

Yeah but they were center halves.
 
The official confirmation and presentation vids are certainly taking its time!
Wonder why they are delaying
 
Spurs v M a n C I t y replay
GK 1 Aleksic
RB 6 Perryman
CB 4 Roberts
CB 3 Miller
LB 2 Houghton
MF 7 Ardiles
MF 10 Hoddle
MF 5 Villa
S 8 Archibald
S 11 Crooks
LW 3 Galvin
 
Kandi1977 said:
The official confirmation and presentation vids are certainly taking its time!
Wonder why they are delaying
Click to expand...
If the Onion did Spurs news:
Drăguşin deal on rocks as Djed Spence refuses Italy switch after mom reminds him pasta never his favorite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back