Spurs7891
Jermaine Jenas
Whether they are attention-seeking or not, do you think they have a valid point?
It wasn't historic at all. It was one of the most predictable, least closely-contested finals in a while. The World Cup was pretty good, the final was meh. What will be remembered is that for two World Cups in a row FIFA were bribed into hosting the tournament in countries with terrible human rights records. Something that (hopefully once the bribes all stop) people will look back on an wonder how we ever allowed that to happen.
Sports should be just sports. Should not mix politics in sports. Whether you like it or not, the World Cup is the biggest sporting tournament in the world and every World Cup final is historic in nature, to be remembered by history books forever, just like every World Cup finals since 1930 have been. For me, it was the best final since Argentina beat West Germany 3-2 in 1986. It was not really a predictable final as this World Cup has been very unpredictable from start to finish largely due to no team being outstanding and all the defences being vulnerable.
If you do bring politics into sports, then almost all the countries will lose the rights to hold any sporting tournaments as all have their own human rights abuse cases including US and Britain.