• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Premier League Club Accounts


DZ7L6yoWkAIBfvS.jpg

DZ7L8vWXcAA_h77.jpg

DZ7L-sfWkAEEPeC.jpg

DZ7NyzTX4AEuXZV.jpg

DZ7NzZJXkAAIAlF.jpg
 
Well, if you look at those, you realize we haven't caught the teams in front of us yet, but we are putting a huge gap behind us

Our income is at 306M, Leicester's at 233M (but that was their one off CL season, which would have accounted for 45M+ of that revenue)
So 50M to make up gap to next two, 120M behind to nearest competitor.

It's really quite fudged up, take City out of the equation and Levy's stadium and expansion (which was planned before City's sugar daddy) would have had the potential to put us on par or better than everyone bar united.
 
Leicester got more than Real Madrid from the CL last season (£73.2m). They got the champions share (40%) of the English market pool pot, which is based on the English TV rights to the CL.

Doesn't alter your conclusions though. The two clubs £120m behind (West Ham and Southampton) will also probably drop behind Everton.

Leicester City earned more money for reaching the Champions League quarter-finals last season than Real Madrid did for winning the competition.

The Foxes, who were knocked out by Atletico Madrid, received 81.7m euros (£73.2m) in their debut season in the competition.

Champions League winners Real Madrid were paid 81m euros (£72.6m).

Runners-up Juventus were the only club to earn more with 110.4m euros (£98.6m).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/41695802
 
Well, if you look at those, you realize we haven't caught the teams in front of us yet, but we are putting a huge gap behind us

Our income is at 306M, Leicester's at 233M (but that was their one off CL season, which would have accounted for 45M+ of that revenue)
So 50M to make up gap to next two, 120M behind to nearest competitor.

It's really quite fudged up, take City out of the equation and Levy's stadium and expansion (which was planned before City's sugar daddy) would have had the potential to put us on par or better than everyone bar united.

Our new stadium income though will put us on the £400m plus bracket
 
I'd assume so, and that will put us in top 4 income bracket (instead of 6th), you could even argue we likely have a real shot at being 3rd on list.

Wow i didn't expect us to jump up to 4th highest revenue in the league but looking at the numbers that seems quite likely
 
Wow i didn't expect us to jump up to 4th highest revenue in the league but looking at the numbers that seems quite likely

Yep, and that's with no real view of what the NFL deal & other non football related activities at new WHL will do.

If we really pull this off organically, with no financial cheating/doping, it's an amazing statement about our progress and fan base.
 
Wow i didn't expect us to jump up to 4th highest revenue in the league but looking at the numbers that seems quite likely

I'm not so sure. Liverpool weren't in the CL that season.

Bizarre as it might seem, I don't think the new stadium will change our ranking at all. We will close the gap on PL competitors. Likewise in Europe, as Juventus have followed United and Liverpool in extending their commercial interests into regional fish sauce sponsorship.
 
I'm not so sure. Liverpool weren't in the CL that season.

Bizarre as it might seem, I don't think the new stadium will change our ranking at all. We will close the gap on PL competitors. Likewise in Europe, as Juventus have followed United and Liverpool in extending their commercial interests into regional fish sauce sponsorship.

Good point regarding Liverpool, overlooked that.

Still though we are going to be a lot closer to the sides around us than i had previously thought.
 
So post stadium the gap will be commercial - is that solely all the sponsorship deals a club has? Chelsea and Liverpool have double ours but the goons only 50% more, yet they have a naming rights stadium deal?
 
Please just look at that last chart, and consider how well Spurs are doing recently


Sadly as much as I’m a huge admirer of Daniel Levy, we are a football team and our success cannot continually be measured by how frugally we can be while still achieving top 4. Let’s hope we can in the next few seasons start looking outside our excellent financial acumen for success. We need to win the EPL and or CL to make all Levy's excellent stewardship truly worthwhile.
 
Last edited:
Back