It’s perturbing that even as a supporter of absolutely everything he said, I couldn’t bear watching for more than a few seconds.
I really don't get the hate - I think it's a politics of envy because he has an announcement voice and reminds most people of "that manager they wanted to call a clam", combined with impatience from change.
He took over an utterly chaotic ship heading in a very bad direction. He has managed to slow that down and set a different course - but it's a huge turn to get it going in the right direction, and whilst he can steer adequately in controlled waters, What's needed is a rough seas and energetic captain that can galvanize the crew and get the passengers on board and focused on the reality of now ahead of saying "told you we should have booked a flight" or "the rich guy on the top deck says he's got a better boat at home, let's go with him".
Starmer was needed to do what he's done. It was always going to be a bumpy couple of years followed by a replacement (pretty sure I posted that a few years ago!).
Now it needs Blair like energy, Johnson like confidence and Thatcher like destruction of political enemies.
I really think only Reyner fits the bill, with a smartly chosen cabinet to placate the people that can't handle a woman, a ginger or a mowthy burd.
The likes of Thornberry, Burnham (I think she's already set the stage for him to be her no.2 and long term successor with her speech yesterday), Streeting, and some fresh blood to single actual change.
Get some moderate results for three years and actually tell people about them, whilst also being candid about the barriers to delivery and why the alternatives won't work.
I see Reyner as almost like a Chair type - setting direction, getting the team to deliver, and being the mouthpiece. Propaganda Minster if you like rather than Prime Minister.