• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

It won't backfire. There is a large amount of people who will be cheering this. The local elections will tell us what percentage of this country thinks the above is no big deal.
 
johnola said:
A million quid is a lot - most people are not savers they spend every penny every month.

For a typical white collar worker like myself targeting a million quid in my pension pot with about a decade to go that still needs me putting in 40% of my earnings and hoping for double digit annual investment returns and i have already made a lot of sacrifices (no holidays/new cars) over a long period.

Where a million quid is less valuable is in the standard of living this supports = only a functional retirement. The rule of thumb being long term withdrawals accounting for sequence risk run at 4-4.5% of the capital per annum.
Click to expand...
A million quid in your pension pot would make you a millionaire without being anywhere near rich. A million pound business would probably be a good earner without making you rich. In the South East, you could get most of the way to a million with a detached house and a car or two without being anywhere near rich.
 
LutonSpurs said:
It won't backfire. There is a large amount of people who will be cheering this. The local elections will tell us what percentage of this country thinks the above is no big deal.
Click to expand...
It won't backfire because it's the Greens they've chosen. Neither party are palatable to civilised human beings, so they're aiming at those places where it's a close vote between the two.

People who wouldn't usually vote for either would surely choose Reform as the lesser of two evils in this case.
 
scaramanga said:
It won't backfire because it's the Greens they've chosen. Neither party are palatable to civilised human beings, so they're aiming at those places where it's a close vote between the two.

People who wouldn't usually vote for either would surely choose Reform as the lesser of two evils in this case.
Click to expand...

The lesser evil being an entirely subjective view based on what policies matter to you. But yeah I think you are right.

I don't have a local election here but would vote Green if I did.
 
Finney Is Back said:
So probably not actually that everyone on benefits was taking advantage of the system then?
Click to expand...

Then be specific, don't be hateful towards so called lower classes, its not hard. If people are not then its rightfully called out, I don't think thats outrageous

Not least because there are likely people on here who do or have used the benefits system
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back