Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

[Craig_J]

Elphicke is a complete clam, why have Labour let her in?

I agree. As much as I’ve taken glee in the demise of the Tory’s I personally lean much more to the left than the current Labour leadership.

I likewise think it’s not sensible to let her in. I guess right now Labour want to make a mockery of the Tory’s and let them know their own MPs are unhappy.

These MPs seem to be standing down next election anyways. In return they’re getting paid or unpaid advisory positions. Either way it suits them personally to be within the governing party. There’s nothing for them to gain - as impending former politicians - from being in with the outgoing government.

I don’t think anyone could be short sighted enough to genuinely believe they suddenly have lost faith in the politics they ( disclaimer: without knowing their voting records) introduced.

It’s all self centred - on both sides. Any one who chooses to defect draws attention more so to the Tory inner circles lack of belief that they will not be in government. More so than a lack of belief they cannot govern.

Any opposition will always argue the government cannot govern. Every politician that defects is proof of their inner circles resignation to defeat.

If it was down to me I’d be asking whether the person we’re admitting represents the parties values. Either Labour have decided she does not but is worth admitting and her skills will come in useful - or it’s an indication of the direction Labour will go in.

Personally I believe it’s an indication that Starmer won’t shake the boat too much. I personally do not believe that he will offer the level of investment the country needs to jumpstart and rejuvenate itself. That the “broad church” isn’t just to attract dissenters but is what it says on the tin.

But I do still believe we will fair better than we ever did in 15 years on the road to nowhere.

 

[Mikey10]

I agree. As much as I’ve taken glee in the demise of the Tory’s I personally lean much more to the left than the current Labour leadership.

I likewise think it’s not sensible to let her in. I guess right now Labour want to make a mockery of the Tory’s and let them know their own MPs are unhappy.

These MPs seem to be standing down next election anyways. In return they’re getting paid or unpaid advisory positions. Either way it suits them personally to be within the governing party. There’s nothing for them to gain - as impending former politicians - from being in with the outgoing government.

I don’t think anyone could be short sighted enough to genuinely believe they suddenly have lost faith in the politics they ( disclaimer: without knowing their voting records) introduced.

It’s all self centred - on both sides. Any one who chooses to defect draws attention more so to the Tory inner circles lack of belief that they will not be in government. More so than a lack of belief they cannot govern.

Any opposition will always argue the government cannot govern. Every politician that defects is proof of their inner circles resignation to defeat.

If it was down to me I’d be asking whether the person we’re admitting represents the parties values. Either Labour have decided she does not but is worth admitting and her skills will come in useful - or it’s an indication of the direction Labour will go in.

Personally I believe it’s an indication that Starmer won’t shake the boat too much. I personally do not believe that he will offer the level of investment the country needs to jumpstart and rejuvenate itself. That the “broad church” isn’t just to attract dissenters but is what it says on the tin.

But I do still believe we will fair better than we ever did in 15 years on the road to nowhere.

I think it was a pretty smart move on Starmer’s part.

Most of the voting British public don’t pay very much attention to politics. They won’t have a clue who Elphicke is - but they will read or hear the headline, which is that another Tory has defected, signalling once again that the government is in a state of absolute chaos.

Most of the criticism of the decision is from the left of the party, and they have zero experience in the last 40 years of putting together a platform that the public will vote for, so I turn a deaf ear to it.

Election campaigns are a dirty business; this one will be particularly so, I fear. I’m pleased to see the Labour leadership engaging in a bit of sh i thousery.

 

[Pádraig Plaisteach]

Hello, I only came in to this pub to ask for directions, but I saw that the news was on the telly, so I'll stay. I agree with what Mikey10 says above.

As an old Old Labour person, who grew up in the world made by Attlee and Wilson, I'm not (at present) a big fan of Starmer, but I live in hope that he may prove to be more of a lefty than he currently appears to be. I was not a huge fan of Blair, but I acknowledge his many achievements as well as his appalling failures. I have always regarded Corbyn as untrustworthy and foolish, and I think that when he was Labour Leader he empowered the right. There are no words sufficiently strong for me to express how much I detest the current Government. I haven't stayed up all night for a General Election since May 1997. I will be staying up all night for the next one.

 

[Pádraig Plaisteach]

That was when the Tories had a reputation for competence. They were always known as being competent but evil (compared to Labour's well-intentioned but incompetent).
But now after Covid, Truss and the crumbling national infrastructure, they have nowhere to go. Incompetent and evil.

The notion that the Tories have the safer hands is not well supported by the evidence. Neither party has a distinct edge, but it is arguable that Labour have been, on average, as good as if not slightly better than the Tories when it comes to managing the economy.

Labour have tended to come into power when things are in a right state . The Tories can't be blamed for the raggedy state of things in 1945, but they left things in a mess in 1964, 1974, and 1997.

Starmer will inherit an omnishambles from the current Government. I am not sure that he or his Front Bench have the ideas and skills to fix the broken things. Attlee, Wilson (1964 version), and Blair had the ideas, the skills, and the teams to make things better, and the economy was better in 1997 than it is now. Starmer will need, I think, at least ten years to get anywhere near fixing the damage done by the worst Government in living memory.

FactCheck Q&A: Which party has a better track record on the economy?

Who has the better record on managing the economy: Labour or the Conservatives?

www.channel4.com

Labour are much better at running the economy than voters think – new research

We looked at 100 years of Tory and Labour governments to see who was better at producing GDP.

theconversation.com

 

[Diamond Lights]

i think it's safe to say Elphicke's move has made everyone look worse for it. The Tories, Labour, and herself. no one winning from it.

 

[Pádraig Plaisteach]

That may only be true for politics wonks, like us. I view this as Starmer showing that he can do politics, unlike the idiotic Corbyn who is a lifelong student protester, as misguided and ineffective as most such protesters are.

 

[Baleforce]

Heard this quote in the week. Don’t know who originally said it, buts it’s very clever.

“A church so broad it offers Bar Mitvahs”

 

[SpurMeUp]

i think it's safe to say Elphicke's move has made everyone look worse for it. The Tories, Labour, and herself. no one winning from it.

Why do Labour look bad? An MP wishing to switch sides and feeling more aligned to Labour than with the Cons. An endorsement of Labour no?

Anyone would think such party switches had never happened before, yet it’s a common thing; and gives Labour one more seat in parliament.

 

[Baleforce]

Why do Labour look bad? An MP wishing to switch sides and feeling more aligned to Labour than with the Cons. An endorsement of Labour no?

Anyone would think such party switches had never happened before, yet it’s a common thing; and gives Labour one more seat in parliament.

The issue is more that in accepting her, they appear to endorse her politics.

 

[Mikey10]

The issue is more that in accepting her, they appear to endorse her politics.

She was accepted as 95% of people in this country pay politics very little attention on a day-to-day basis. They will only see and remember the headline about another Tory MP defecting, and that will reinforce the feel of a governing party in terminal decline. They’ll have no idea what her political beliefs are.

 

[SpurMeUp]

The issue is more that in accepting her, they appear to endorse her politics.

Why? As though the Labour Party would adapt its own doctrine for one MP. Makes no sense.

While the public feel political parties are akin to Spur vs the Goons, the reality is quite different. And there are all sorts of cross-party committees, discussions and alignments. Ideologies are often the enemy of progress. So many get caught up in doctrine and in-groups. They put this above making positive change. The Labour left almost prefer Tories than a pragmatic centre left. Baffling.

 

[Baleforce]

She was accepted as 95% of people in this country pay politics very little attention on a day-to-day basis. They will only see and remember the headline about another Tory MP defecting, and that will reinforce the feel of a governing party in terminal decline. They’ll have no idea what her political beliefs are.

Or reinforce the feeling that all parties are the same.

 

[Baleforce]

Why? As though the Labour Party would adapt its own doctrine for one MP. Makes no sense.

While the public feel political parties are akin to Spur vs the Goons, the reality is quite different. And there are all sorts of cross-party committees, discussions and alignments. Ideologies are often the enemy of progress. So many get caught up in doctrine and in-groups. They put this above making positive change. The Labour left almost prefer Tories than a pragmatic centre left. Baffling.

Because parties still have a political starting point.

This is a woman who came out against poor children being fed and improving our attempts to tackle climate change.

She is a very right wing clam.

 

[parklane1]

Or reinforce the feeling that all parties are the same.

I agree all parties are full of arseholes, liars and wanabees and it would be hard to find a honest person in any of them. I was always a Labour voter until Blair took us to a war on a lie and since then its hard to tell who has any decency in any party.

 

[SpurMeUp]

Because parties still have a political starting point.

This is a woman who came out against poor children being fed and improving our attempts to tackle climate change.

She is a very right wing clam.

Have you considered the reverse? That joining Labour might make her a better person? Maybe she wanted to back these things but was constrained by the party. If she’s not standing in the next election, the only material difference is an extra vote for Labour whipped votes, and as Mikey says a sign of the general shift to the left.

 

[Baleforce]

Have you considered the reverse? That joining Labour might make her a better person? Maybe she wanted to back these things but was constrained by the party. If she’s not standing in the next election, the only material difference is an extra vote for Labour whipped votes, and as Mikey says a sign of the general shift to the left.

If she wanted to back those things she should have said so at the time.

I have no time for politicians that bend to the whips.

 

[Diamond Lights]

Heard this quote in the week. Don’t know who originally said it, buts it’s very clever.

“A church so broad it offers Bar Mitvahs”

The News Agents podcast i think

 

[scaramanga]

The right economic policies are being offered. You just have to look outside the Conservative and Reform parties to find them

There are some very strong economic policies being put forward. Unfortunately they're from parties of racists that I couldn't vote for.

 

[scaramanga]

But ok to have them continue

No, absolutely not.

Taxes and spending have to be cut significantly but nobody wants to admit it.

 

[Gutter Boy]

Blimey, Labour's 6 pledges thing is so anodyne. There should be so much appetite out there for spirit of renewal, great restoration type stuff. There's just no inspiration at all