The EU is welcome to pay for it.Or stop using NI as a political football would be my preference.
The EU is welcome to pay for it.Or stop using NI as a political football would be my preference.
unfeckinbelievableseeing as the title says "thanks for all the fish"... Not shellfish though:
The EU has told British fishermen they are indefinitely banned from selling live mussels, oysters, clams, roosterles and scallops to its member states.
As the UK is now a separate country, it is not allowed to transport the animals to the EU unless they have already been treated in purification plants.
But the industry says it does not have enough tanks ready and the process can slow exports, making them less viable.
The government promised to continue to "raise the issue" with the EU.
Good thing we hold all the cards and they need us more than we need them.
unfeckinbelievable
seeing as the title says "thanks for all the fish"... Not shellfish though:
The EU has told British fishermen they are indefinitely banned from selling live mussels, oysters, clams, roosterles and scallops to its member states.
As the UK is now a separate country, it is not allowed to transport the animals to the EU unless they have already been treated in purification plants.
But the industry says it does not have enough tanks ready and the process can slow exports, making them less viable.
The government promised to continue to "raise the issue" with the EU.
Good thing we hold all the cards and they need us more than we need them.
It's partly spite, but a lot of stupidity from UK exporters too.Taking my own personal views out of it. It looks really like the EU are making trade deliberately difficult out of spite. If the UK sells the majority of its seafood to the EU. Then it means that Europe has a desire for a product from the UK.
I can understand a few extra firms to fill. But anything more then that really comes across as spiteful and trying to punish or squeeze the UK and its fishermen. Unless Europeans have stopped desiring seafood from the UK.
Obviously I'm a leaver so I have deep held beliefs but I'm trying to look at in a neutral way and if this situation was anywhere else in the world. Say China and Vietnam I would think that the side who were putting extra restrictions were behaving like bullies.
I know you guys all have view on the brexit thing and thats fine and I understand that. But if you want a view from the other side I can tell you how the EU are behaving are just backing up my views on them.
Trade between nations should always be tariff free.
seeing as the title says "thanks for all the fish"... Not shellfish though:
The EU has told British fishermen they are indefinitely banned from selling live mussels, oysters, clams, roosterles and scallops to its member states.
As the UK is now a separate country, it is not allowed to transport the animals to the EU unless they have already been treated in purification plants.
But the industry says it does not have enough tanks ready and the process can slow exports, making them less viable.
The government promised to continue to "raise the issue" with the EU.
Good thing we hold all the cards and they need us more than we need them.
I think it was the Telegraph that pointed out almost all of the EU's fresh, coldwater fish comes from our waters.I can't quite understand why the fishing industry seems to get so much attention considering its relative importance to the UK economy. There are plenty of other industries feeling the bite too but fishing seems to be a headline grabber.
Taking my own personal views out of it. It looks really like the EU are making trade deliberately difficult out of spite. If the UK sells the majority of its seafood to the EU. Then it means that Europe has a desire for a product from the UK.
I can understand a few extra firms to fill. But anything more then that really comes across as spiteful and trying to punish or squeeze the UK and its fishermen. Unless Europeans have stopped desiring seafood from the UK.
Obviously I'm a leaver so I have deep held beliefs but I'm trying to look at in a neutral way and if this situation was anywhere else in the world. Say China and Vietnam I would think that the side who were putting extra restrictions were behaving like bullies.
I know you guys all have view on the brexit thing and thats fine and I understand that. But if you want a view from the other side I can tell you how the EU are behaving are just backing up my views on them.
Trade between nations should always be tariff free.
Trade between nations should always be tariff free.
Not my point though. I was talking about its outsized position fishing seems to have compared to its paltry size. It seems headline hogging compared to other industries.I think it was the Telegraph that pointed out almost all of the EU's fresh, coldwater fish comes from our waters.
So it was a hugely contentious point, given that we could have both killed off much of the EU fishing industry and closed off their access to most of their fresh fish.
It made the headlines because it was such a point of contention for the EU.Not my point though. I was talking about its outsized position fishing seems to have compared to its paltry size. It seems headline hogging compared to other industries.
Well that's my point. They are concentrating more on the woes of the fishing industry over problems in other industries with a far bigger overall impact on the economy. Anyway, I guess it is not that important.It made the headlines because it was such a point of contention for the EU.
I suspect it's stayed in the press because that's how they work - keep reporting on a single story until it's rinsed.
Not for a few years anyway. It will become a little more important around renegotiation time.Well that's my point. They are concentrating more on the woes of the fishing industry over problems in other industries with a far bigger overall impact on the economy. Anyway, I guess it is not that important.