SissokoWasGood (BoL)
Alf Ramsey
Its an odd one though - while I dont think he was ever going to be PM, he got 40% of the vote in 2017. Theresa May has got to be the only party leader to come out of a GE in which her party got over 43% and not get a huge majority.
I think Starmer convincing him to u-turn on Brexit resulted in the 2019 collapse as Labour voters in leave areas voted for the tories to ensure it went through.
Starmer actually got Labour fewer votes in 2024 than Corbyn achieved in either of his elections.
And I feel sorry for Sunak and Hunt because they are night and day over Starmer and Reeves in terms of competence - but people were just sick of the tories after party gate and the Liz Truss debacle so they got in by default. Honestly you could have put up Mr. Blobby with a red rosette for PM in 2024 and he'd have got a super majority...
FWIW I don’t find Sunak and Hunt to be any more competent than Starmer and Reeves. I’m not saying this as a fan of one party or the other necessarily. I think Sunak was a good and extremely smart man that was dealt a brick hand and played it extraordinarily badly. And I think Starmer is someone that consistently proves his doubters wrong, but has usually tended to start terribly in his political roles and learn quickly. I think he was also dealt a brick sandwich in taking over and on the real substance I’m not sure what else I would have wanted him to do. There were hard choices each way you turned.
I think where Starmer so far has been absolutely terrible is on the communication. I can’t work out why it’s been so bad, but taken individually they have a set of pretty popular policies that have not been tied together into a singular narrative that enough people can get behind. And by the same token attempts to trim around the edges (relatively speaking, given the amounts spent) on welfare for example, or some of the changes to farmers, dominate the narrative as some sort of proof that he’s a dud.
I don’t think he’s a dud, I think he’s been very canny especially on the international stage especially with Trump. And my belief is that he’s doing a lot of unpopular things in the first year in order to build momentum towards the next GE in the subsequent years to come.
Overall though I think Starmer and Reeves are just as competent as Sunak and Hunt. But Labour have to really deliver in the next 4 years. I’m not sure, given the rate at which politics moves, and how we’ve seen their first year go, whether they’ll do enough to satisfy the mood for change in the country. They would have to take some really big swings, and succeed with them. Otherwise I don’t see how stability and watering down your attempts at change because of back bench rebellions gets the job done. And I don’t say that because I have a view on the changes one way or the other, I just mean that you need to be seen to be doing something to drive change, you need to be seen to be capable of doing it. He can’t look impotent.