They can live wherever they want. What kind of person would dispute that or try to stop them?But there is only one "telling" the Jews that they can live wherever they want, at whatever cost to anyone else.
They can live wherever they want. What kind of person would dispute that or try to stop them?But there is only one "telling" the Jews that they can live wherever they want, at whatever cost to anyone else.
Kemi Badenoch "Perhaps he can show concern for the 1,100 people who found out yesterday that they could lose their jobs at Vauxhaul's plant in Luton"
Keir Starmer "I would remind her.. The EV mandate was introduced by the last government.. She was the Business Secretary that introduced them"
I love you and a lot of your views but capital gains tax is already to high, you mad lunatic.
How would you end Hamas without civilian casualties?
Also, what is an acceptable proportion of casualty to combatant deaths? Would you be surprised to hear that the ratio is better in Gaza than in most wars?
I agree. Everyone with half a brain cell knows we need to ween ourselves off fossil. Even those on extreme righf right merely argue about the timescales rather than the end goal of being fossil-free. European and Japanese manufacturers claim they can't mass produce EVs at competitive prices and that we should do something about it.It's actually a good policy. Arguably the only intelligent thing she has ever done. It's just the consequence of European and Japanese car manufacturers clinging on to big oil, while the Chinese have flown past them with EVs. It's one thing (for the sake of the planet), we just need to stop protectionism and let the Chinese cars flood in (obviously first wiping the spy tech out of the software).
Then the only remaining option is to kill terrorists faster than they can grow them. I bet Israel can.Hamas is a partisan force. Every adult will fight till the occupation is over or till the genocide is completed. You don't leave moderates when you massacre 1/10th of a population (44% of whom were children)
Yes and the problem is that Hamas and most Palestinians see "the occupation" as being not just the bits of land Israel is occupying outside of the original mandate boundaries, but they see Israel's existence as an occupation. "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" is their mantra.Hamas is a partisan force. Every adult will fight till the occupation is over or till the genocide is completed. You don't leave moderates when you massacre 1/10th of a population (44% of whom were children)
It's actually a good policy. Arguably the only intelligent thing she has ever done. It's just the consequence of European and Japanese car manufacturers clinging on to big oil, while the Chinese have flown past them with EVs. It's one thing (for the sake of the planet), we just need to stop protectionism and let the Chinese cars flood in (obviously first wiping the spy tech out of the software).
They can live wherever they want. What kind of person would dispute that or try to stop them?
Then the only remaining option is to kill terrorists faster than they can grow them. I bet Israel can.
How would you end Hamas without civilian casualties?
Also, what is an acceptable proportion of casualty to combatant deaths? Would you be surprised to hear that the ratio is better in Gaza than in most wars?
EV car sales have properly taken off. EVs accounted for 19% of new car registrations in the UK so far in 2024, not far off the government target for 2024 of 22%. Infrastructure is getting there and isn't the obstacle. You say Toyota and Honda have gone for hybrids due to current battery technology. The current battery technology is there. You can buy a Tesla model 3 long range for £45K that will give you over 436 miles of range.(single motor version).The sales of EVs won't properly take off until the infrastructure for charging is in place in the big markets and the next generation of batteries are ready for mass production. They'll hopefully be cheaper, have better capacity and be fully recyclable. Toyota and Honda are both getting there, albeit slowly. Toyota have gone for hybrids with the current battery technology and that's probably what I'd look at if I needed a new car now.
Your stance is very one-eyed though. While Israel should do those things, you can't expect them to while not expecting the same things of the other side.Stop illegal occupation of land that doesn't belong to you (except vis the words of your very particular sky GHod from a very long time ago).
Respect international law.
Hold your nose and engage in good faith in a forward looking solution to the situation politically.
Allow meaningful development and aid within the Palestinian lands so that poverty is reduced and dependency on the one organisation co-ordinating education and relief is politically side-lined.
Don't keep the population at just above starvation dependency.
Don't turn a blind eye or even positively allow the supplying of arms and monies to the terrorist organisation you claim to be fighting just so you have a bogeyman enemy to unite your followers against.
Gosh so many ways to eliminate Hamas without killing 10s of thousands of civilians.
Doesn't result in prime real estate for Israelis though.
And your entitled to your principles.Just in principle I don't agree that people should make more wealth from their wealth than people are allowed to from their labour. The higher rates need parity with income tax brackets.
Your stance is very one-eyed though. While Israel should do those things, you can't expect them to while not expecting the same things of the other side.
Because Palestinian hardliner's have their own adherence to (your words) imaginary sky GHod books from long ago that tell them that every bit of what is now Israel is their land and if they don't fight and defeat the occupiers they won't be able to join their imaginary sky GHod in the imaginary after party.
So until everyone removes themselves from the "I'm on their side" mentality, guess what? It ain't ever going to end.
The Palestinians have the right to live anywhere they want. As far as I know, nobody is stopping that.You deliberately ignored a) the at any cost to anyone else part & b) the inference that a sky GHod telling them they had the right to live where they want gave them primacy over anyone else's right to live where they want.
By your statement everyone has the right to live where they want (which i agree is fair) so the Palestinians have the same rights to all of the roman province (to take some arbitrary historical date line) of, say, Palestine as the Jews have to their biblical home borders of Judea and Samaria.
What kind of person, indeed, would dispute or try to stop the Palestinians?
I didn't say any of that. I said that Israel can kill Hamas terrorists faster than they can make them.By killing them before they can become terrorists? That would be the only way. Kill them as children to avoid the potentiality of them becoming terrorists.
Wow. Sounds like eugenics to me.
Ok, so Israelis want security (the reason for pushing borders further away from central locations) and Palestinians want land (I'll take your word for that for the sake of discussion).Stop illegal occupation of land that doesn't belong to you (except vis the words of your very particular sky GHod from a very long time ago).
Respect international law.
Hold your nose and engage in good faith in a forward looking solution to the situation politically.
Allow meaningful development and aid within the Palestinian lands so that poverty is reduced and dependency on the one organisation co-ordinating education and relief is politically side-lined.
Don't keep the population at just above starvation dependency.
Don't turn a blind eye or even positively allow the supplying of arms and monies to the terrorist organisation you claim to be fighting just so you have a bogeyman enemy to unite your followers against.
Gosh so many ways to eliminate Hamas without killing 10s of thousands of civilians.
Doesn't result in prime real estate for Israelis though.