Grays_1890
David Ginola
Yeh all because of Glory GloryYou soppy sods no wonder we are exploited so mercilessly.
Yeh all because of Glory GloryYou soppy sods no wonder we are exploited so mercilessly.
Yeh all because of Glory Glory
How do you work that out?Yeh all because of Glory Glory
Or all because we see an exploited child as just that. An exploited child. Regardless of their skin tone.
Well it was you alluding to comments on here being a reason for being exploitedHow do you work that out?
If only kids could grow up without any deliberate mind bending thoughts being pushed into their heads.
No religious or political or cultural exposure until they are of age.
suits me how about you?
you and your point scoring fella.Wth are you on about. She was groomed. And she should return to the UK and face a court for her crimes.
you and your point scoring fella.
fudges sake.
Good point on the government's new online safety bill: this will attempt to prevent 16 and 17 year olds from connecting to and accessing certain news and media outlets. Labour's own preamble is that these age groups are easily influenced and therefore their access to certain information sources must be restricted - with the other hand they're giving this cohort the vote. Make it make sense.
Well here in Australia Facebook. X, Reddit, YouTube, Snapchat & tiktok are not going to be available to kids under 16 that makes sense to me. Banning 16 & 17 year Olds seems oddGood point on the government's new online safety bill: this will attempt to prevent 16 and 17 year olds from connecting to and accessing certain news and media outlets. Labour's own preamble is that these age groups are easily influenced and therefore their access to certain information sources must be restricted - with the other hand they're giving this cohort the vote. Make it make sense.
you and your point scoring fella.
fudges sake.
You care to explain what this meant?
It is not "banning", the Online Safety Act introduces a duty on online content providers to prevent "misinformation" and "disinformation" and that duty is extended when that information may be accessed by children (i.e. under 18s). The definition of what constitutes "misinformation" and "disinformation" however is the key concern - ultimately the act is enforced on behalf of the government meaning any sitting government now has far reaching powers to control the information British citizens are subjected to and block information it does not like and that is creating some of the concern whether well intentioned or otherwise.....Well here in Australia Facebook. X, Reddit, YouTube, Snapchat & tiktok are not going to be available to kids under 16 that makes sense to me. Banning 16 & 17 year Olds seems odd
![]()
How will the teen social media ban work? Here's what we know
Australia is months away from implementing its world-first social media ban for teens. But questions still remain around how the restrictions will work.www.abc.net.au
Your insinuation of racism sunshine. Don’t act all innocent.
If I was racist I will vote reform.
Am I racist?