• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

Or all because we see an exploited child as just that. An exploited child. Regardless of their skin tone.

If only kids could grow up without any deliberate mind bending thoughts being pushed into their heads.

No religious or political or cultural exposure until they are of age.

suits me how about you?
 
If only kids could grow up without any deliberate mind bending thoughts being pushed into their heads.

No religious or political or cultural exposure until they are of age.

suits me how about you?

Wth are you on about. She was groomed. And she should return to the UK and face a court for her crimes.
 
Good point on the government's new online safety bill: this will attempt to prevent 16 and 17 year olds from connecting to and accessing certain news and media outlets. Labour's own preamble is that these age groups are easily influenced and therefore their access to certain information sources must be restricted - with the other hand they're giving this cohort the vote. Make it make sense.
 
Good point on the government's new online safety bill: this will attempt to prevent 16 and 17 year olds from connecting to and accessing certain news and media outlets. Labour's own preamble is that these age groups are easily influenced and therefore their access to certain information sources must be restricted - with the other hand they're giving this cohort the vote. Make it make sense.

16-17 year olds all understand proxy servers and VPNs, so it's likely only limiting older people's access to those outlets.
 
Good point on the government's new online safety bill: this will attempt to prevent 16 and 17 year olds from connecting to and accessing certain news and media outlets. Labour's own preamble is that these age groups are easily influenced and therefore their access to certain information sources must be restricted - with the other hand they're giving this cohort the vote. Make it make sense.
Well here in Australia Facebook. X, Reddit, YouTube, Snapchat & tiktok are not going to be available to kids under 16 that makes sense to me. Banning 16 & 17 year Olds seems odd

 
Well here in Australia Facebook. X, Reddit, YouTube, Snapchat & tiktok are not going to be available to kids under 16 that makes sense to me. Banning 16 & 17 year Olds seems odd

It is not "banning", the Online Safety Act introduces a duty on online content providers to prevent "misinformation" and "disinformation" and that duty is extended when that information may be accessed by children (i.e. under 18s). The definition of what constitutes "misinformation" and "disinformation" however is the key concern - ultimately the act is enforced on behalf of the government meaning any sitting government now has far reaching powers to control the information British citizens are subjected to and block information it does not like and that is creating some of the concern whether well intentioned or otherwise.....
 
Back