Stats Stats Stats - they are the best friend of every AVB fan. I'll leave it at that.
6 home wins in a row against Liverpool. No reason why we shouldn't expect another one. Liverpool never look as good when Gerrard is missing.
Can't see us keeping a clean sheet with the form Suarez is in, so need to go in with the game plan of scoring several.
a toss up? I think Sandro ****es all over him in my opinion. Lucas is a good solid dependable defensive midfielder. But he's no Sandro.
If both players bring their A game Sandro owns Lucas every time
I'd hope we're a little more adventurous than dedicating our central midfield to stopping Liverpool. Fast tempo, move the ball quickly/directly and go for the throat from the 1st minute please Tottenham. No more of this limp 0-0 half time rubbish.
And what, pray, is wrong with having AVB as Tottenham's manager?
Why do they tend to use AVB's full name?
But the obvious weakness when drawing conclusions from stats like this is that they did not all manage the same set of players. Hardly fair for example to compare the team AVB had last year to David Pleat in 2003-2004 when Pleat's midfield consisted of Michael Brown and an ageing Gus Poyet while AVB had dembele and arguably the 3rd best player in the world. I dread to think what AVB's win percentage would be with a central midfield pairing of Zokora and Jenas.
But the obvious weakness when drawing conclusions from stats like this is that they did not all manage the same set of players. Hardly fair for example to compare the team AVB had last year to David Pleat in 2003-2004 when Pleat's midfield consisted of Michael Brown and an ageing Gus Poyet while AVB had dembele and arguably the 3rd best player in the world. I dread to think what AVB's win percentage would be with a central midfield pairing of Zokora and Jenas.
Not seen anyone draw any conclusions from them other than the one thing that's a fact: AVB has the highest win percentage of any Tottenham manager in the PL.
But that is a disingenuous comparison to all the other managers because we are not looking at the same set of circumstances?
My point is it is a silly comparison, let AVB's work speak for itself rather than compare to managers who had poorer resources. It's like saying the man with the more money buys a bigger house than the man with less money that may be a fact but it's what is expected.Why would you want to compare him to Pleat or Gross anyway? The only ones worth comparing to would be Francis, Redknapp and Jol as they were managers in periods of relative success, though Francis is really too long ago, but I think the purpose here is to show that AVB isn't doing a bad job.
My point is it is a silly comparison, let AVB's work speak for itself rather than compare to managers who had poorer resources. It's like saying the man with the most money buys the bigger house than the man with less money that may be a fact but it's what is expected.
But my point is that nobody is making those comparisons. It's just a list of all Spurs managers since the birth offootballthe PL. The question is: Is he supposed to be doing better and if so, why?