Strongly agree. Remember arguing a while back that Son should be in ahead of Lamela but got hammered for it at the time.Which bit? About him being injured or deserving a run in the side? Am I wrong though? He demonstrated quite clearly he offers more than Lamela in these tight games with teams sitting back. Lamela makes too many poor decisions - like when we were 3v2. And it's not the first time he has done that .
lamela is an all round midfielder that son is not.
lamela tracks backs, tackles and leaves his foot in when necessary.
lamela is what we need now.
Son all day, because he has great close control, whilst Lamela has the touch of a rapist. The Leicester defenders were loathe to tackle Son because of this. The camera work was a tinkle take. I reckon I missed at least five minutes of the game because of the brick direction.
He never did fit in at Chelsea!Ranieri is a class act. Smiles to congratulate Poch at the end.
Watching the replay now. great match by both ( @70min)Thus far I think both Bentaleb and Carroll have been strong...
Which bit? About him being injured or deserving a run in the side? Am I wrong though? He demonstrated quite clearly he offers more than Lamela in these tight games with teams sitting back. Lamela makes too many poor decisions - like when we were 3v2. And it's not the first time he has done that .
Sick of hearing the media banging on about a 'weakened' Leicester side. We had no Dembele, no Kane, no Toby, no Jan, no Lloris, no Rose...is it our fault that we actually have a fudgeing SQUAD that is all getting close to being on par? Second thoughts, let them bang on and not notice!!!!!!!!!
But they are. What should they be chanting instead?Don't like the your fecking sh1t chant
But they are. What should they be chanting instead?
Like the way Poch started the move for our second goal with a deft chip!
It depends who were playing...lamela is an all round midfielder that son is not.
lamela tracks backs, tackles and leaves his foot in when necessary.
lamela is what we need now.
Harsh. Great assist record this season methinks, and the moment you're thinking of only happened because he pressed and harried and won the opportunity.
It depends who were playing...
Against Sunderland the other day we could have comfortably played Son instead of Lamella as no defensive side was needed from a forward. Against a better side probably not
Lamella does track back and fight etc... But you don't pick an attacker on his defensive attributes. Lamella does more than though but I still think it comes down to scoring important goals which is something son has shown he is more capable of. He is also a contrast between the other attackers rather than being similar
It depends who were playing...
Against Sunderland the other day we could have comfortably played Son instead of Lamella as no defensive side was needed from a forward. Against a better side probably not
Lamella does track back and fight etc... But you don't pick an attacker on his defensive attributes. Lamella does more than though but I still think it comes down to scoring important goals which is something son has shown he is more capable of. He is also a contrast between the other attackers rather than being similar
You lot are all too fuzzed about the commentary. I don't know the English commentators and who they support, and frankly don't care about it either. To me the commentary was just fine, and certainly not biased towards either side!Quite amusing they think the commentary was biased against Leicester...
They do have a point on the goddamn 'narrative' editing sh*t. At one point clearly the commentary team and BBC producer were working together: endless sweeping shot of the crowd for several seconds (all while play was going on) while Pearce & Kilbane banged on and on about the f**king crowd.
Shut. The. F**up. Up. Stop this narrative cobblers and show the bloody match!!!