Bedfordspurs
Chris Waddle
Depends what system we are playing for defending corners.Kane is front post with the no 25 (fernandino?) and Toby and Dier yeith side of sterling.
Do we really need two of them on sterling?
Depends what system we are playing for defending corners.Kane is front post with the no 25 (fernandino?) and Toby and Dier yeith side of sterling.
Do we really need two of them on sterling?
YepYeah second half we were much better for the first 20 mins which is not to say we were great but we were better. Lo Celso, particularly, I thought got much more into the game and took some risks on the ball.
Ndombele would have been ideal if he was interested because he’s so good on the ball even under intense pressure. However, I don’t blame Mason one bit for dropping him. His performance against Southampton was disgraceful.
Your point re long balls is a good one but Carragher is spot on.
View attachment 11720
This is where Winks got the ball and ultimately turned around and took the easy way out. Neither Hojbjerg or Lo Celso is in the picture. That's unforgivable. So now Winks has to drive into space and risk being pressed or play a longer, riskier pass to find a team mate. In the end, he takes the easy option. Hojbjerg, Winks and Lo Celso did that repeatedly in the first half. The CBs had no option but to knock it long or sideways to the full backs. When the full backs got it, City pressed us, when it went long, it inevitably came back to us.
YepI know it's just hammering the same point over and over, but we really look like a team that hasn't been coached what to do in posession - Son & Kane at least have years of playing together to fall back on and Moura just does his own thing most of the time but between Winks Hojberg and Lo Celso (and Ndombele in other games) there's no experience as a unit for them to fall back on and against teams like City you'll get exposed - the only difference between Sunday and the 2 nil at WHL was that we caught them out with a couple of quick breaks.
Honestly i think it's absolutely criminal the way certain aspects of our game have been neglected for the last 18 months
Whether you’re right or wrong that’s no excuse for this squad that according to some are easily top 4 material who couldn’t even do the basics. I was fine with Mourinho being sacked before the final, thinking we couldn’t perform any worse. I was wrong, I’d bet my house we would have played better than that and at the very least would have started with a better lineup and made such questionable subs. But hey ho, it’s done now.....I know it's just hammering the same point over and over, but we really look like a team that hasn't been coached what to do in posession - Son & Kane at least have years of playing together to fall back on and Moura just does his own thing most of the time but between Winks Hojberg and Lo Celso (and Ndombele in other games) there's no experience as a unit for them to fall back on and against teams like City you'll get exposed - the only difference between Sunday and the 2 nil at WHL was that we caught them out with a couple of quick breaks.
Honestly i think it's absolutely criminal the way certain aspects of our game have been neglected for the last 18 months
Whether you’re right or wrong that’s no excuse for this squad that according to some are easily top 4 material who couldn’t even do the basics. I was fine with Mourinho being sacked before the final, thinking we couldn’t perform any worse. I was wrong, I’d bet my house we would have played better than that and at the very least would have started with a better lineup and made such questionable subs. But hey ho, it’s done now.....
Had Hojberg shot when he should have that number would have gone up somewhat tbf - had we executed that break when Kane & Son were doing everything right we'd have likely scored...
That's not to say weren't completely and utterly dominated
Or Zakora?!Hojbjerg really annoyed me. He should have shot with his left. If he was going to pass it, he had to give a much better pass than he did. He gave Reguilon no chance. Then to have the neck to blame Reguilon for it...cheeky bastard.
Stefan Freund would have been better in that position than PEH.
Or Zakora?!
Hojbjerg really annoyed me. He should have shot with his left. If he was going to pass it, he had to give a much better pass than he did. He gave Reguilon no chance. Then to have the neck to blame Reguilon for it...cheeky bastard.
Stefan Freund would have been better in that position than PEH.
That very last picture demonstrates just how important Emirates Marketing Project's tactical fouls were and also how poor the ref was. I think this was the second foul (which should've been the red). If so and he couldn't make the foul having correctly been booked earlier then he would've been leaving us 4 on 2 which is a goal 90% of the time in top level football. That situation should've therefore been either goal or red card.
Caragher describes the exact reason why I always argued against those who wanted us to play Winks earlier this season when we were horribly deep under Jose and rarely managing to transition defence to attack. For some reason Winks has a reputation with a few on here as being a good passer of the ball, he is anything but, he hits his passes weakly, has little vision and is pretty much always far too safe with his passing option. It creates nice stats for him in terms of completed passes but actually puts the team under more pressure and wastes opportunities to attack while the opposition are disorganised.Your point re long balls is a good one but Carragher is spot on.
View attachment 11720
This is where Winks got the ball and ultimately turned around and took the easy way out. Neither Hojbjerg or Lo Celso is in the picture. That's unforgivable. So now Winks has to drive into space and risk being pressed or play a longer, riskier pass to find a team mate. In the end, he takes the easy option. Hojbjerg, Winks and Lo Celso did that repeatedly in the first half. The CBs had no option but to knock it long or sideways to the full backs. When the full backs got it, City pressed us, when it went long, it inevitably came back to us.
Kane is always a free man for us on corners and isn't detailed to mark a playerKane is front post with the no 25 (fernandino?) and Toby and Dier yeith side of sterling.
Do we really need two of them on sterling?
Maybe the players were assigned who to mark and where to mark themKane is always a free man for us on corners and isn't detailed to mark a player
I think Toby was supposed to be marking Fernandinho....
The fact that Dier would rather mark Sterling and leave Laporte to a midfielder says it all.
Sissoko is a terrible defender of corners/free kicks as he has shown umpteen times for us.