• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

O/T Battersea Drogs Home

I hope this is true. To have them scumbags associated with such an iconic piece of the London landscape would have been difficult to stomach. fudge 'em.

But more to the point do Chelsea need a 60k stadium or is this just the Russian compensating for his small penis again?
 
I can see Battersea power station from my flat. Going on the market the minute this gets approved. Imagine having to look at that every time you left your front door
 
Rorschach said:
I hope this is true. To have them scumbags associated with such an iconic piece of the London landscape would have been difficult to stomach. fudge 'em.

But more to the point do Chelsea need a 60k stadium or is this just the Russian compensating for his small penis again?
Click to expand...

Gourlay said they have outgrown Shamford Bridge, yeh right, laughable
 
Denmark Spur said:
Chelsea is set to be disappointed in its bid to develop a new stadium at LondonÔÇÖs iconic Battersea Power Station site, Reuters reported on Monday.

The UEFA Champions League winner was one of around 15 bidders who this month submitted plans to buy the protected site on the south bank of the River Thames, which has witnessed numerous failed redevelopment attempts in the three decades since it shut. Chelsea is aiming to transform the site into a 60,000-seat venue, with the bid marking the latest effort by the Barclays Premier League club to resolve its current stadium limitations at Stamford Bridge. Chelsea believes its plan can create one of the most iconic football stadia in the world, but admitted it is not guaranteed to succeed with the bid and has not elected to abandon the option of redeveloping Stamford Bridge.

Reuters, citing a source close to the sale process, stated that Malaysian real estate company SP Setia and veteran British developer Godfrey Bradman are leading the chase to buy the site with one other bidder also in the frame. ChelseaÔÇÖs bid is described as ÔÇ£way off the paceÔÇØ and an announcement on the future of the site could be made this week.

Chelsea has previously been urged to focus on redeveloping its Stamford Bridge home, with the clubÔÇÖs local council stating in March that it would be far more expensive to develop a new stadium. Chelsea has said that the prospect of renovating Stamford Bridge to a 60,000-seat capacity would be unlikely, adding that the planning risks would probably be ÔÇ£insurmountableÔÇØ.

However, Hammersmith and Fulham Council, a long-time supporter of Chelsea retaining its Stamford Bridge roots, believes an expanded venue is possible at the site. It also believes a move away would likely cost far more than the ?ú600 million figure Chelsea has previously cited to redevelop its home of 107 years. Stamford Bridge is only the eighth-largest stadium in the Premier League and club officials are concerned that this may place Chelsea at a financial disadvantage in the match day revenue stakes.

http://www.sportbusiness.com/news/185618/chelsea-set-to-miss-out-in-battersea-stadium-bid-report
Click to expand...
You could almost claim to be ITK.....

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/jun/07/battersea-power-station-chelsea-malaysia

Shame.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back