• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

O/T Battersea Drogs Home

southstand1882

Mitchell Thomas
Chelsea make offer to buy Battersea Power Station


Chelsea have made a bid to buy Battersea Power Station in south-west London and plan to redevelop it into a 60,000 capacity stadium.


The landmark's four chimneys would be kept as part of a design which includes a 15,000 seat single-tier south stand.


Chelsea said in March expanding their current home, Stamford Bridge, made no economic sense, while a new stadium on the site faced planning problems.


The club added they are not the only party interested in acquiring the site.


"We must also stress that making an offer for the Battersea Power Station site does not mean the club has made a definitive decision to leave Stamford Bridge."


The club say the plans, which would preserve the building's Grade Two listed turbine hall and control room, would provide "a unique architectural backdrop to a world-class stadium".


A development of shops, housing and offices, and a contribution to the extension of the Northern Line underground service into the area, are part of the offer.


Stamford Bridge's capacity of 42,000 compares unfavourably to Arsenal's Emirates Stadium, which holds 60,000, and Manchester United's Old Trafford ground, which has seating for 76,000.


Chelsea have been linked with other sites in south west London as they considered ways of increasing revenue, such as selling naming rights to the stadium, at their present home.


The club had previously shown an interest in taking over a site in Earls Court once the Exhibition Centre had been demolished, and had been rumoured to be considering a bid for Chelsea and Westminster hospital.


Battersea Power Station's owners have been trying for more than a year to find an equity investor to fund a proposed ?ú5.5bn redevelopment.


Energy stopped being generated at the station in 1983, but the site is still used for hosting events - one of the latest being the ATP World Tour Finals Gala.
 
chelsea bidding for battersea power station

Very sad at the thought of them moving there, would have to see their ground every time i caught the train to london. Really hope they do not get it, if they are stuck where they are they will never meet the fair play rules.
 
Chelsea make offer to buy Battersea Power Station


Chelsea have made a bid to buy Battersea Power Station in south-west London and plan to redevelop it into a 60,000 capacity stadium.


The landmark's four chimneys would be kept as part of a design which includes a 15,000 seat single-tier south stand.


Chelsea said in March expanding their current home, Stamford Bridge, made no economic sense, while a new stadium on the site faced planning problems.


The club added they are not the only party interested in acquiring the site.


"We must also stress that making an offer for the Battersea Power Station site does not mean the club has made a definitive decision to leave Stamford Bridge."


The club say the plans, which would preserve the building's Grade Two listed turbine hall and control room, would provide "a unique architectural backdrop to a world-class stadium".


A development of shops, housing and offices, and a contribution to the extension of the Northern Line underground service into the area, are part of the offer.


Stamford Bridge's capacity of 42,000 compares unfavourably to Arsenal's Emirates Stadium, which holds 60,000, and Manchester United's Old Trafford ground, which has seating for 76,000.


Chelsea have been linked with other sites in south west London as they considered ways of increasing revenue, such as selling naming rights to the stadium, at their present home.


The club had previously shown an interest in taking over a site in Earls Court once the Exhibition Centre had been demolished, and had been rumoured to be considering a bid for Chelsea and Westminster hospital.


Battersea Power Station's owners have been trying for more than a year to find an equity investor to fund a proposed ?ú5.5bn redevelopment.


Energy stopped being generated at the station in 1983, but the site is still used for hosting events - one of the latest being the ATP World Tour Finals Gala.

Design Sound familiar?
 
May the 4th Special!

yoda_ibtl.jpg
 
are they actually thinking of using the power station as a stadium or building one next to it ?

doesn't seem anywhere big enough to me
 
Have they sorted out purchasing their previous stadium yet?


Though i don't recall whether or not building a stadium counts a footballing cost.. I tend to think it won't..
 
Very sad at the thought of them moving there, would have to see their ground every time i caught the train to london. Really hope they do not get it, if they are stuck where they are they will never meet the fair play rules.

Let me go one further. If this country let's those ****S move into that special site and special building, then we will know once and for all what a complete bunch of kittens the government have become...
 
Let me go one further. If this country let's those ****S move into that special site and special building, then we will know once and for all what a complete bunch of kittens the government have become...

I saw a plan for that site where they had a museum and centre in the station and made the rest of the area into a lovely park. Sad thing is this country is only geared to money and no council would ever give such a plan the go ahead as they want to get more money through homes or business. I hope one day we start doing more things for the community in this country and i say that as someone who is not a scoilist but a little bit the other way.

The victorians seemed so much better then we are at doing things that benefit the society as a whole. I saw in a development the other day how the developer was trying to get out of building some paths for access to a site yet the victorians seemed to have a better approach and more joined up thinking.
 
This will please a lot of people in Battersea as they have been claiming for years that they live in South Chelsea. The Victorians industrialist were brutal but there were many of them that did have a social conscience and a vision of the future, whereas today its all about your bonus and never staying in a top job long enough to get the blame for short term measures.
 
Chelsea is set to be disappointed in its bid to develop a new stadium at London’s iconic Battersea Power Station site, Reuters reported on Monday.

The UEFA Champions League winner was one of around 15 bidders who this month submitted plans to buy the protected site on the south bank of the River Thames, which has witnessed numerous failed redevelopment attempts in the three decades since it shut. Chelsea is aiming to transform the site into a 60,000-seat venue, with the bid marking the latest effort by the Barclays Premier League club to resolve its current stadium limitations at Stamford Bridge. Chelsea believes its plan can create one of the most iconic football stadia in the world, but admitted it is not guaranteed to succeed with the bid and has not elected to abandon the option of redeveloping Stamford Bridge.

Reuters, citing a source close to the sale process, stated that Malaysian real estate company SP Setia and veteran British developer Godfrey Bradman are leading the chase to buy the site with one other bidder also in the frame. Chelsea’s bid is described as “way off the pace” and an announcement on the future of the site could be made this week.

Chelsea has previously been urged to focus on redeveloping its Stamford Bridge home, with the club’s local council stating in March that it would be far more expensive to develop a new stadium. Chelsea has said that the prospect of renovating Stamford Bridge to a 60,000-seat capacity would be unlikely, adding that the planning risks would probably be “insurmountable”.

However, Hammersmith and Fulham Council, a long-time supporter of Chelsea retaining its Stamford Bridge roots, believes an expanded venue is possible at the site. It also believes a move away would likely cost far more than the ?ú600 million figure Chelsea has previously cited to redevelop its home of 107 years. Stamford Bridge is only the eighth-largest stadium in the Premier League and club officials are concerned that this may place Chelsea at a financial disadvantage in the match day revenue stakes.

http://www.sportbusiness.com/news/185618/chelsea-set-to-miss-out-in-battersea-stadium-bid-report
 
Back