New Striker or New Stadium?

[Spursalot]

By your reasoning we shouldnt sign anyone ever again

Not at all. By his reasoning we shouldn't gamble the future of the club on the now.


We should build up to it, as we have been successfully for a number of years now.

 

[milo]

That's not at all what he said. We shouldn't spend money we haven't got in the hope that it might pay off. Signing a player is always a gamble, but at the very least do it with money you can afford to lose. Building a stadium gives you an asset that will still be there 20 years from now (if not we hopefully have insurance), a player could get injured or turn to brick tomorrow.

And who's to say that the right player is available, at the right price, right now.

 

[jimmyb]

No problem from me either.

I listed above 10 reasons why I consider a top striker should be our leading priority now.

If we dont get a new striker and we fail to make CL (or even EL) would you still be happy to have a new stadium? Probably minus Bale as well?

As I recall, you stated on another thread that you wanted a new striker. Am I wrong there too?

Absolutely.

I've said all along that we need at least one new striker. In terms of the team, it is our greatest priority.

We need a new stadium too.

But, at the risk of being repetitive, it isn't an either / or situation.

 

[Crawley]

Am I right in thinking we've exhausted this topic now?

Move along.....nothing to see here!!!!!

 

[jts1882]

So - to take your (incorrect) interpretation of my question. Do you want a stadium NOW or a striker NOW?

Definitely the stadium now. I don't want to wait the three years to build it. If we could get the revenues immediately we would be in a much better position. We could even afford that striker we also need in the summer.