You're right.I think you have just answered your own question.
I was going to buy my son the new kit, now I've seen it I went and got him a larger version of the old one in the sale.
You're right.I think you have just answered your own question.
Jan doesn't look so convinced.
He never does.
Who writes this sh*t?"The design is intended to subtly reference the architecture of the new stadium while creating a dynamic head-to-toe gradient that reinforces the underlying explosive energy of our players."
"It features binary blue and polarised blue knit sleeves to emphasise the team’s powerful energy as we enter an exciting new era."
"The design is intended to depict how the players’ values continue to glow and resonate when we travel, while the polarised blue shorts and socks pay homage to the heritage of the secondary blue used in many past kits, now executed in a bolder shade that sets the tone for a bright future."
Who writes this sh*t?
Someone who gets paid a lot to do so.
Oh...the Adebayor of advertising and marketingSomeone who gets paid a lot to do so.
Gonna need an all white shirt.First kit. Pretty good. It's got a classic clean look at the top with the club and Nike logos. A shame about the giant red AIA but that is something we've come to expect. The gradient to blue at the bottom is different and not objectionable. Unnecessary, but far better than yellow tinkle streaks or similar effects at the top of the shirt.
Second kit. Looks like they couldn't decide between dark and light blue so designed to pay homage to Arsenal and West Ham. I suppose this is what happens when you think personal values are something that glows.
Nice to see the AIA in white on the second strip. If only they could put it on the first shirt and justify it with some bumff about it representing hidden strength.
AIA again, I thought last year was only a one year deal?
And, I thought, we were trying to get a stadium + shirt sponsor.
Obviously things are very quiet on that front, might it suggest we remain stadium-sponsorless this season?