It would appear Nike's designers used all their crayons up on the 3rd shirt.
Red notwithstanding, that's quite nice.
Agree with that.I hate Arsenal more then most on this board but honestly having some element of red on the kit has never bothered me. Don’t get me wrong, I’d never be ok with us bringing out an all red kit or even a red shirt but I can live with sponsors and Nike logos being red.
Loving the new kit btw.
I always like a traditional all white shirt but I’m sure I read on the OS recently that next seasons kit will feature a similar c,ockere,l to the one on the early 60s kit.
This because it was something like 100 years of wearing the c,ockere,l next season.
Agree with that.
But.... why can't we just find a sponsor with a blue or black template?
It's like a continuous wind up for most Spurs fans, same when we had Thomson.
Aurasma whatever that was/is looked fine.
I wonder if they offered one of these without the red sponsor if they’d get a big uptake!
Can we have a rule on here that anyone who buys their kit from the far east is forbidden from complaining about how much we spend on transfers?
Men in replica football kit = bad.And if they are a grown man and not buying for a child then also that they are a clam.
And if they are a grown man and not buying for a child then also that they are a clam.
Can we have a rule on here that anyone who buys their kit from the far east is forbidden from complaining about how much we spend on transfers?
Men in replica football kit = bad.
Men in fishnet tights = good.
47?At least if you have someone sat in front of you, wearing the 3rd kit with "Markysimmo 47" on the back, you know to book different seats next time