Ah, his 'apologists'. I see. Well, from my perspective as an 'apologist', you absolutely don't want him to be brilliant - you want him to be awful, because it allows you to dump on him as your sacrificial lamb, the player you knew would be sh*te. You can criticize him and be happy that you're being proven 'right', as if always expecting the worst from a player is ever truly 'right'. You brave, visionary fan, you.
I quite seriously doubt you can ever say what you see with regard to Sissoko, unless you 'see' only what you want to see and nothing else. Which is admittedly possible - probable, even.
Once again, there were eight players on that field immeasurably worse than Sissoko in every aspect of the game - from defensive to offensive to showing a bit of heart, fight and spirit. They gave the ball away more, they were lazier, slower, less interested, more useless and less dangerous in *every* respect. Kieran Trippier, Eric Dier, Jan Vertonghen, Ben Davies, Mousa Dembele, Dele Alli, Christian Eriksen, Harry Kane. Eight golden boys who were indescribably awful at times.
And yet, you choose to label Sissoko as the worst out of all them.
It does indeed make some things quite clear.