Again, different company.They came up with the technology. Next you'll be insisting that Monsanto refused payment by the US defence department.
I think you need to get it straight which company you are against, the pre 2000 general chemical company or the post 2000 agricultural company that exists now.
If you want people to campaign against the pre 2000 one, then it will be a short campaign - the company already doesn't exist.
Here, read this for more info. The Monsanto of now is a tiny part of what was that had nothing to do with any of what you've posted. They just reused the brand name to save about $40M of repackaging and rebranding - turns out to be one of the worst business decisions ever made.
http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/why-the-climate-corporation-sold-itself-to-monsanto