parklane1
Tony Galvin
Did either of them get to hold Ron Burgess' hand as he led the team out?
No but they got to see Ossie chain smoking in the dressing room before the game.
Did either of them get to hold Ron Burgess' hand as he led the team out?
Although you try hard, I'm not gonna take the bait. Go troll somewhere else on the forum.
Perhaps somewhere where you can pay to be the biggest troll.
If it means enough, people can or will find the money - it's not as if it's a huge sum. Especially not if you're going to matches regularlyHaving more money doesn't mean you want it more. Probably the opposite.
it's not as if it's a huge sum. Especially not if you're going to matches regularly
But it does create a more fair method than chance to pick mascotsSurely this is the point. In the greater scheme of things, it's a drop in a bucket to the club and does nothing to enhance it's image/reputation/financial well being.
My son was a mascot. I got it for free as I was working for Thomas Cook at the time (they organise the travel packages for Spurs fans).
It was the last game of the season and my son was the smallest - he was only 4 at the time. It turned out to be Michael Dawson's last ever game for us, and was also the last game that the captains mascot had a kickabout with the captain - hugo doesn't do it.
Proud moment for me, but as a previous poster said, I think my son was a bit overwhelmed and terrified
It's still chance, wheather you pay or not. There are far more applicants than avilable spots for mascots. That's why it should not be charged, or at least not more than what a regular ticket costs.But it does create a more fair method than chance to pick mascots
It should be charged at the point where applicants and tickets are balanced. If it's priced too low then it's left too much to chance, it it's priced too high then there will be empty spots.It's still chance, wheather you pay or not. There are far more applicants than avilable spots for mascots. That's why it should not be charged, or at least not more than what a regular ticket costs.
So what you say is that a big fan that happens to be the son or daughter of a single mom/dad with low income, should be excluded, so that the children of rich parents should have a better chance.It should be charged at the point where applicants and tickets are balanced. If it's priced too low then it's left too much to chance, it it's priced too high then there will be empty spots.
It's a lot for some. Far better to give it out randomly than to someone with a silver spoon up their arse.If it means enough, people can or will find the money - it's not as if it's a huge sum. Especially not if you're going to matches regularly
No it doesn'tBut it does create a more fair method than chance to pick mascots
The least fair method is chance - that takes away the opportunity to earn the right to be a mascot (or for one's kid to be). The world has a fairly solid system by which it distributes scarce resources, I don't see why Spurs should think themselves better than centuries of development and work around that system.So what you say is that a big fan that happens to be the son or daughter of a single mom/dad with low income, should be excluded, so that the children of rich parents should have a better chance.
What a nice guy you are
Everything is a more fair method than chance.No it doesn't
No its notEverything is a more fair method than chance.
The least fair method is chance - that takes away the opportunity to earn the right to be a mascot (or for one's kid to be). The world has a fairly solid system by which it distributes scarce resources, I don't see why Spurs should think themselves better than centuries of development and work around that system.
By your logic, would you be happy if all tickets were given out by lottery every week? If a load of Korean tourists got to go to a cup final instead of those with plenty of loyalty points? I don't think that's fair.
So mascots should be kids of those with most loyalty points?The least fair method is chance - that takes away the opportunity to earn the right to be a mascot (or for one's kid to be). The world has a fairly solid system by which it distributes scarce resources, I don't see why Spurs should think themselves better than centuries of development and work around that system.
By your logic, would you be happy if all tickets were given out by lottery every week? If a load of Korean tourists got to go to a cup final instead of those with plenty of loyalty points? I don't think that's fair.
It would be far fairer than random chanceSo mascots should be kids of those with most loyalty points?
Of course it's not all about the kids. Do you think kids instigate this or parents on the whole?"Earned the right to be a mascot." Are you serious? So how exactly, has some five year old "earned the right"? Oh, you mean mummy and daddy. but I thought this was meant to be all about the kids? Clearly I was mistaken, it's all about parental income.