Finney Is Back
Luka Modric
I'd say Diaz is a very good player. I suspect he will prove that next season if he avoids serious injury.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Manor Solomon
- Thread starter Chrissivad
- Start date
Chrissivad
Dean Austin
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
That would be a good outcome - paying them a reasonable compensation, even though we're not obliged to.
Kandi1977
Garth Crooks
Yeah, it's actually outrageous that other clubs can just scavage them for players, for reasons totally out of their control.
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
It should be about a €1m euros judging by what they paid and the length of his contract remaining
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
I reckon £5m is probably fair. He's a £20m player, but yeah, obviously only 6 months left on his contract.
Maybe we should go £1m cash + £4m in BAE Systems vouchers?
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
He ain’t a £20m player
That’s dreamland
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Was just going on the Transfermarkt valuation
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
So a made up one
He hasn’t done anything to justify the value
He is being brought as a prospect
£20m would get you Danjuma who actually has done stuff for example
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Its an independent organisation that uses objective metrics, so better than journalists picking a number from the air. But its not accounting for his contract.
Danjuma and Gil were £25m+ signings, so its a reasonable ballpark
Bedfordspurs
Mark Falco
Not really
It’s a German website
Set up several years ago that has now been hailed as the truth
We will sell Gil for less than £20m this window
Danjuma would be available too for that price
Shaktar are not being ripped off with him leaving on a free, but they have every right to be unhappy
He has a value
Just a very low one
NorwegianSpursFan
Neil Ruddock
I suspect that legally it would be very difficult for fifa to change the conditions of a contract with a set start and end date.
Kandi1977
Garth Crooks
That would make them liable to pay the compensation to the affected clubs. In my view, they kind of still are. It's FIFA/UEFA that should pay these clubs for the players, not the clubs they join.
Grays_1890
Chris Jones
Fulham had a pre loan deal of 7m agreed so I would imagine that's the starting point
I can't see how they could. Unless a contract has a broadly drafted force majeure clause in it, there's nothing they can do about it. And more of those clauses which I've seen don't cover wars
No normal contract means you have to risk your life in order to do your job. Your workplace being in a warzone would qualify. Fifa just allowed foreign players to reregister with other clubs.
Glenda's Legs
Paul Walsh
War is most definitely covered under Force Majeure. It is usually anything outside of a party's reasonable control that prevents that party fulfilling its contractual obligations. War would generally be outside of the control of most parties to a contract. Unless of course one of parties is a certain Mr. V. Putin.
But why have they had the power to ‘suspend’ the contracts but not freeze them? (Or rather to allow players to unilaterally suspend, instead of allowing players and teams to agree to a freeze?)
If there’s some technical legal issue with freezing, surely you could get around it by saying players can suspend and play for other clubs, but that period then has to be added to the original contract with the Ukrainian team? So in practice it’s effectively frozen.