• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Leaving Jacksons Ranch

I'm not sure what to think. MJ was a messed up guy, but how messed up? It's a shame this comes up after his death. There's always two sides to a story, and this film leaves us only with one of them.
Also, in the light of all this, why is it only two of them who speaks now? What does the other ones, like Macaulay Caulkin, Omar Batti and others gain from denying sexual abuse, if there was such? What do they have to lose by telling, if something really went on?
The film raises just as many questions as it answers.
I'm really split as to what to believe.
 
Anyone listened to the lyrics of the track 'Will you be there' since watching Leaving Neverland?
 
Kandi1977 said:
I'm not sure what to think. MJ was a messed up guy, but how messed up? It's a shame this comes up after his death. There's always two sides to a story, and this film leaves us only with one of them.
Also, in the light of all this, why is it only two of them who speaks now? What does the other ones, like Macaulay Caulkin, Omar Batti and others gain from denying sexual abuse, if there was such? What do they have to lose by telling, if something really went on?
The film raises just as many questions as it answers.
I'm really split as to what to believe.
Click to expand...

True but then again the network of pay offs is huge, staff signing agreements not to talk.

What is telling are the Cory Feldmans saying they can no longer defend it
 
Kandi1977 said:
I'm not sure what to think. MJ was a messed up guy, but how messed up? It's a shame this comes up after his death. There's always two sides to a story, and this film leaves us only with one of them.
Also, in the light of all this, why is it only two of them who speaks now? What does the other ones, like Macaulay Caulkin, Omar Batti and others gain from denying sexual abuse, if there was such? What do they have to lose by telling, if something really went on?
The film raises just as many questions as it answers.
I'm really split as to what to believe.
Click to expand...
It was all known about before he died, we knew about the payoffs and the rumours were there. I guess the fact you cant slander the dead makes it easier to have a full report now.

even then the estate is trying its best using a loop hole

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2...son-leaving-neverland-documentary-lawsuit-hbo

The estate is claiming that by showing Leaving Neverland, HBO is violating a non-disparagement clause from a 1992 contract. According to the suit, when HBO aired Michael Jackson in Concert in Bucharest: The Dangerous Tour, the clause precluded them from disparaging the singer in future works.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back