It’s so obvious recently I’m actually wondering if it’s by tactical design.
Either as it’s seen as a way to push trips up for an attacking benefit, or just because he’s so brick at defending!
Maybe because we've won 74% of games he's played this season against 67% when he hasn't?I dont understand how he keeps getting picked, are the other two that bad?
He was a disaster again yesterday and was sheer luck/poor finishing that meant we did not get punished.
Look at his positioning from the screen grab yesterday....
I think that two headed arrow is Sissoko's shot into the next timezone. Thankfully he's improved at everything else.Can only assume that Pochettino is expecting the Bury Becks to create hatfuls of chances for Llorente with his prodigious crossing ability... and, as you say, I’d trust Sissoko in a footrace with any decent wide forward more than Trippier anyway...
View attachment 5966
The theory may be sound but in practice we are giving up loads of chances down that side. I'm not sure it is working that well as a tactic.Exactly what I was going to say.
I wont go so far as to say Trippier is playing well, but I think him being up field is certainly by design. In a lot of ways it compensates for both of their deficiences.
Good management by Poch IMO.
This is the key for me. Walker and Rose got and get caught out up the pitch from time to time but their recoveries were better.I really think he is to slow to play right back in our side.
Maybe because we've won 74% of games he's played this season against 67% when he hasn't?
The theory may be sound but in practice we are giving up loads of chances down that side. I'm not sure it is working that well as a tactic.
Arsenal 2-4 (PL)Who have those games been against we lost?
This is the key for me. Walker and Rose got and get caught out up the pitch from time to time but their recoveries were better.
Why I prefer Aurier, Im not saying he's as pacy as Walker but he certainly looks better in recovery situations etc Also think Aurier does put in a fair share of good crosses, certainly dont think Trippier for all his apparent delivery quality creates enough opportunities for him to warrant being first choice.....This is the key for me. Walker and Rose got and get caught out up the pitch from time to time but their recoveries were better.
Why I prefer Aurier, Im not saying he's as pacy as Walker but he certainly looks better in recovery situations etc Also think Aurier does put in a fair share of good crosses, certainly dont think Trippier for all his apparent delivery quality creates enough opportunities for him to warrant being first choice.....
Trips is playing winger, with Sissoko sitting in. Clearly Trips is not expected to be both furthest forward AND full back.
Just because Walker and Rose tried to do this, does not mean mere mortals can do it
My main concern with Trippier is that he consistently struggles against wingers with pace, and Dortmund have a lot of pace
Strange you say he needs to cross the ball early, I'd argue that crossing early is his one big speciality! Personally I love the way he hooks it first time across the face of the goal. I'd argue he has been doing that all along in recent games, not always as accurately as you'd wish but often enough. Part of the problem imo is the failure of our forwards to get on the end of them.He struggles defensively in general, and his attacking output has been poor for quite some time.
I have no problem with him being up field, but if he is, he needs to cross early and often (especially with Llorente in side), and he needs to run back on the line. Instead, he gets the ball high up, stands on it, then passes back or sideways. And when he gets caught out, he will actually follow the ball into the center, which still leaves his side exposed ..
We have to make sure next season he's second choice, he can be decent cover, but first choice in big games he's simply not good enough.
Correlation doesn't prove causation as the old adage goes. It may just be a statistical quirk. I genuinely don't think his influence is big enough to cause us to win more games when he plays. It does seem though, that the more tactically astute managers target him. Managers like Espirito de Santo and Puell. I think Rose is far more influential.As I have pointed out previously, it's interesting that our overall win % when he plays is better than when he doesn't. Explain that one!