• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Kane vs The '23 Beatles/S-Club 7

Gutter Boy

Tim Sherwood
Two alternatives:

1) Sell Kane, but then sign all 6 of say Tapsoba, van der Ven, Phillips, Scott, Orban and Veliz. I.e. 6 highly promising 19-24 YOs, including 3 CBs, a Maddison rotation #10 and 2 potential Kane heirs to develop under Richarlison.

or

2) Keep Kane, and only sign van der Ven and Phillips. So filling our two CB gaps with promising players, but doing nothing else.

Stick or twist? How much do we trust our scouts to make the Kane money work to our advantage. Or is evolution better than revolution?
 
Only 2 choices? Not a third where neither happens but we keep Kane and move others on and sign one or two of those you mention?
 
Only 2 choices? Not a third where neither happens but we keep Kane and move others on and sign one or two of those you mention?

That's the obvious preference, but it seems quite clear we don't have the finances to do that. So shall we keep it as a tough binary choice?
 
Sell Kane, I can't stand an other year of media and internet crap after every match or quite day. We need to refresh the squad.
 
Back