• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

January transfer rumour thread

Levy was willing to sanction a 30m deal for Rossi, 30m for Llorente, and 35m for Aguero so why wouldn't he sanction a deal for Hazard?

So Levy can sanction a ?ú40m deal for Hazard but still cannot stump up the dosh to buy the striker we need? And you guys believe that? WTF?
 
Last edited:
A front free of Bale Ade Eden would be pantwetting. Then you can have a midfield 3 of Modric and Parker plus any of either Sandro/Hudd/Rafa depending on who we play.

I havent seen a great deal of Hazard and so honestly cant judge, but if his reputation is anything to go by Im sure you could be onto something
 
We wont be doing any major transfers until Redknapp's situation (with England) is sorted out in the summer.
Levy knows we have no need to buy anyone right now, we're not gonna win the title even if he bring someone in. And buying players in the January window always cost more than in the summer.

As for Hazard and twitter? There isn't even a real journalist called Will Morgan working for the Guardian. Some people will believe anything if its good news.
 
So I am suppose to believe that last Jan we made a bid for 38.5m (euros or pounds?) which was rejected yet last summer we were unable to buy a striker and we only brought Adebayor in after we had lost 2 matches shipping 8 goals? Yeah right

its all over the tabloids and from harry's mouth in black and white

its not as if KD is making up those rumours on deadline day about us going helter skelter for all those strikers , people quoting 30 million plus.

wait, are you not believeing KD or are you aware of the rumours / harry's comments but still dont believe him / them? i cant quite make it out what you're saying here.

everyone had the same questions...

1. how were we able to attempt to spend serious amounts of money in january but then all of a sudden we had to sell before we bought?
2. we sold a good amount of players..what happened to the money?
3. where did all the CL money go?

Tottenham Hotspur are not broke. the money is there for the right investment
 
[Update 45] Archibald re: Giovani
Who archibald
Date 25th Jan
Site Spurs Odyssey

nothin done yet.. meeting tonight. a consortium wants to buy the player a la Tevez.. long way off..
 
we tried to get etoo, we tried to get rivaldo (or was that sugar?), we tried to get torres, we tried for llorente and we tried for rossi. i'm guessing all these players would have been record purchases

we can afford to spend 40 million pounds on a player. we've just never been in a position to attract one.

what you're saying is that we cant shell out 40 million for one player. i personally think thats wrong. i think we can

can i ask you what you think levy and enic's transfer policy looks like?

I know very well what you think of the transfer policy, and broadly I agree.

However, this is near 3 times our transfer record. Uncharted and unlikely territory IMHO.

And considering Levys reluctance even with CL football to actually seal a deal I think it highly improbable he will suddenly throw BIG money around now.

?ú40m would make Hazard one of the PLs biggest ever transfers, and we certainly arent Chelsea, City or Utd who currently hold all the big deals.
 
We wont be doing any major transfers until Redknapp's situation (with England) is sorted out in the summer.
Levy knows we have no need to buy anyone right now, we're not gonna win the title even if he bring someone in. And buying players in the January window always cost more than in the summer.

As for Hazard and twitter? There isn't even a real journalist called Will Morgan working for the Guardian. Some people will believe anything if its good news.

thats the beauty of the way levy operates (can be abit annoying and not constructive), the purchase of hazard wouldnt have much to do with harry's future either
 
You say Levy won't spend this, Levy won't spend that as if it's fact but you have no idea what he's prepared to do. Just because he hasn't spent this amount previously doesn't mean anything, the fact we are where we are now could mean he's prepared to invest heavily for those 'special' players whereas before our stock wasn't even high enough for anyone of that level to even be interested if we did lodge a bid.

I have no idea what Levy is actually prepared to spend, just like anyone else on this board.....

I dont know for a fact what he will do, but I am able to look at his MO in his years with the club and make an educated guess at what is or isnt likely from Levy.

And Im near certain a ?ú40m player purchase at this point is up there with the flying pigs.....
 
So I am suppose to believe that last Jan we made a bid for 38.5m (euros or pounds?) which was rejected yet last summer we were unable to buy a striker and we only brought Adebayor in after we had lost 2 matches shipping 8 goals? Yeah right

Man i wish i knew what you were talking about.
 
why? please could you elaborate on that?

what does modric or bale have to do with us making a bid for Hazard?

and why would hazard not even be a target? assuming he was willing to come that is?

What I mean is he is not the target man big striker that most of us are crying out for. He is an attacking midfielder/winger where we already have an abundance of talent. (Bale, VDV, Modric, Lennon, Kranjcar) so it seems very odd we would splash that much cash on him as he wouldn't even be assured to break our starting lineup without one of our current crop being sold.
 
I know very well what you think of the transfer policy, and broadly I agree.

However, this is near 3 times our transfer record. Uncharted and unlikely territory IMHO.

And considering Levys reluctance even with CL football to actually seal a deal I think it highly improbable he will suddenly throw BIG money around now.

?ú40m would make Hazard one of the PLs biggest ever transfers, and we certainly arent Chelsea, City or Utd who currently hold all the big deals.

okay maybe 40 million is a streeeetch. but 30 million plus performance based add ons for instance to me isnt.

i've just remembered something...about 2 years back we debated the policy to death and back. totally forgot. so you do know what i was going to say. no change there then...

but i'm telling yo guys this....if goetze and hazard are available then we are in there like flint
 
What I mean is he is not the target man big striker that most of us are crying out for. He is an attacking midfielder/winger where we already have an abundance of talent. (Bale, VDV, Modric, Lennon, Kranjcar) so it seems very odd we would splash that much cash on him as he wouldn't even be assured to break our starting lineup without one of our current crop being sold.

Hazard is better than all of those bar Bale. Joe Cole said he was the closest thing on the planet to Ronaldo. He's quick, very skillful and plays with his head up. Players in the french league have had a go at him, literally stating that he has got to stop "taking the tinkle" out of them with his skill.
 
As soon as you start waving the big numbers in front of us, we become like piranhas in a feeding frenzy. Who was the last big-name signing we had that cost more than 8mil euros? I also don't think we're going in for Hazard, but would be totally surprised if we did actually put a bid in.

As Naija said earlier, I don't see us going for an attacking midfielder/winger when we REALLY need a striker.

Any amusement that stems from ITK flimflam ought to be at the expense of said ITK making a fool of himself. Why do many of the SC posters have such a boner for these ITKs?
 
While we arent on the breadline I would be amazed if we had ?ú40m available to spend.

There has been an obvious reluctance to spend on the team at critical points, like when we made the CL we failed to capitalise.

Lots of talk about big bids on players, none I recall as official, but either way none actually pulled off either. If money isnt the issue you can force these things, we clearly werent exactly committed to these supposed offers.

We havent even secured a quality striker (of our own) in the last 4 windows when it has been painfully obvious we need one.

While I agree Levy is willing to spend when he things it will be of benefit to the business, I do not see him spending those amounts of money on an investment when he wont even spend half of that on improving the team to push on performances.
 
okay maybe 40 million is a streeeetch. but 30 million plus performance based add ons for instance to me isnt.

i've just remembered something...about 2 years back we debated the policy to death and back. totally forgot. so you do know what i was going to say. no change there then...

but i'm telling yo guys this....if goetze and hazard are available then we are in there like flint

20 mil plus 15 mil in add ons would be realistic. And maybe a percentage of future transfers. Hazard will transform our team. The way forward nowadays is to play with 2/3 attacking Mids behind striker who float free. These players are more in the mould of nasri, hazard, goetze, marin, silva than proper wingers. Players who can cut inside float free and make runs in the gaps between attack and defense. Using these sorts of players we will become a truely strong team regardless of how good our strikers hold up play is. 3 AMs will give us all the possession we need, all we require is a poacher to knock them in.
 
20 mil plus 15 mil in add ons would be realistic. And maybe a percentage of future transfers. Hazard will transform our team. The way forward nowadays is to play with 2/3 attacking Mids behind striker who float free. These players are more in the mould of nasri, hazard, goetze, marin, silva than proper wingers. Players who can cut inside float free and make runs in the gaps between attack and defense. Using these sorts of players we will become a truely strong team regardless of how good our strikers hold up play is. 3 AMs will give us all the possession we need, all we require is a poacher to knock them in.

lille will laugh us off the table if we only put down 20 million in front of them. no way they'd entertain that..if that was the case..hazard would be off somewhere else by now
 
okay maybe 40 million is a streeeetch. but 30 million plus performance based add ons for instance to me isnt.

i've just remembered something...about 2 years back we debated the policy to death and back. totally forgot. so you do know what i was going to say. no change there then...

but i'm telling yo guys this....if goetze and hazard are available then we are in there like flint

I have absolutely no doubt we would be interested, they fit our policy perfectly. Young, quality players almost guaranteed to appreciate if we signed them.

Where I begin to disagree is with Levys commitment to fight off competition, put up big bucks, and win the prize. He simply has never done this before.

Whenever we have made these buys, Berbatov, Modric, Bale, Sandro... We have stolen in early and sneaked the deal through before anyone else could make a fight of it.

We paid good, but not extravegent money, never got drawn into a bidding war.

As soon as someone pushes we fold - look at the Arshavin deal.


That said, I could go so far as to imagine a ?ú25m + add on type deal (as mentioned) but think it would be highly unlikely to ever happen. This would be Levy operating at his very limit (so far), would be a steal if Hazards reputation rings true, and would rely on another club not getting involved - as well as Lille (is he at Lille?) finding the deal acceptable...
 
Back