• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

James Maddison

I agree. Might only be £40m rather than £105m, but I think its a statement signing and will improve us no end
That’s the key
He may improve us 10%
I think rice is great but is he gonna them in the same level, proportionately
I don’t know
I think their midfield was excellent last season
 
Alternatively:

Maddison for £40m or Havertz for £65m?

Think we have by far the better deal

Just seen some Gooner on Sky who thinks we will all be jealous of how Arsenal have spunked £170m on Rice and Havertz, and how they got one over on City with Rice..not sure on that, if City truly wanted him I am sure they would have blown them out of the water.
 
Just seen some Gooner on Sky who thinks we will all be jealous of how Arsenal have spunked £170m on Rice and Havertz, and how they got one over on City with Rice..not sure on that, if City truly wanted him I am sure they would have blown them out of the water.

Who the fudging hell even was she?
 
Back