• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Injuries

Some earlier stats posted showed that our distance run and sprints made stats were very similar to Liverpool's.

FWIW those charts posted a few pages ago were from a BBC article on the 4th of October, so I don’t know if the same is still true


This piece on our incredible sprinting stats posted before the Liverpool match show that we’ve taken on Bielsa’s mantle for muderball.


Opta Analyst found that Postecoglou’s side rank first in the Premier League this season for sprints (180.7 per game), pressures in the final third (68.7 per game), off-the-ball runs to try and receive a pass (172.5 per game), sprints to try and receive a pass (59.8 per game), and overlapping runs (32.8 per game). Their average distance of each off-the-ball run (22.1 metres per run) is also further than any other team.

Of course it can depend on your output/actions within those minutes.
Think rounds in boxing.

Whilst I can understand wanting to overpower opponents by outrunning them I’m unsure there’s quite such a clear benefit to rushing to take goal kicks when we’re leading games.

It all requires an extraordinary amount of work that is inevitably difficult to maintain at all times. In fact, Postecoglou’s demand for high intensity even extends to getting the ball back into play. Opta Analyst found there is scarcely any effort to slow play and run down the clock when Spurs are ahead in games, using an average of just 17.3 seconds (the quickest in the league by some margin) to take a goal-kick when they are winning.

IMG_4458.jpeg
 
FWIW those charts posted a few pages ago were from a BBC article on the 4th of October, so I don’t know if the same is still true


This piece on our incredible sprinting stats posted before the Liverpool match show that we’ve taken on Bielsa’s mantle for muderball.


Opta Analyst found that Postecoglou’s side rank first in the Premier League this season for sprints (180.7 per game), pressures in the final third (68.7 per game), off-the-ball runs to try and receive a pass (172.5 per game), sprints to try and receive a pass (59.8 per game), and overlapping runs (32.8 per game). Their average distance of each off-the-ball run (22.1 metres per run) is also further than any other team.



Whilst I can understand wanting to overpower opponents by outrunning them I’m unsure there’s quite such a clear benefit to rushing to take goal kicks when we’re leading games.

It all requires an extraordinary amount of work that is inevitably difficult to maintain at all times. In fact, Postecoglou’s demand for high intensity even extends to getting the ball back into play. Opta Analyst found there is scarcely any effort to slow play and run down the clock when Spurs are ahead in games, using an average of just 17.3 seconds (the quickest in the league by some margin) to take a goal-kick when they are winning.

View attachment 18382
The second article only shows one stat where you can compare us to Liverpool (and I'm not convinced that average time delay before restarting play is a massively important one. Even in that stat you see Liverpool in third place.
 
You have to doff your cap to Liverpool looking at those stats.

Liverpool are built for the press model

- Salah, Jota, Gapko, Diaz, Nunez, they can sub out 3 in the front every game, and as long as one of Salah or Jota is on, chances are they can stay clinical.
- They also rotate the FBs a bit
- Previously had utter workhorses in midfield, added a little more quality to it over time.

Very well done, there challenge will be replacing Salah & VVD, the drop in quality to next one down is considerable
 
Yet a bunch of people on here want us to replace our current manager with the manager of Bournemouth....

Liverpool's stats are also broadly similar to ours and yet they are fine. Is that because they have a bigger, better squad than us or could it be that they have just been less unlucky with injuries?
Re Liverpool, I'd think it's a bit of both. Not having injuries to start with, having a fairly big squad of good players, which means you CAN rotate, and luck.
We had a few injured at the start of the season, Odobert arrived late, Solanke got injured pretty much straight away etc.
 
The second article only shows one stat where you can compare us to Liverpool (and I'm not convinced that average time delay before restarting play is a massively important one. Even in that stat you see Liverpool in third place.

Looks like Slot has ratcheted down their sprinting since the start of the season, to compensate for having some older players in the squad who cannot gegenpress like they used to back in Klopp’s heyday.


 
Looks like Slot has ratcheted down their sprinting since the start of the season, to compensate for having some older players in the squad who cannot gegenpress like they used to back in Klopp’s heyday.


Those stats do not correspond with other stats posted here, where Liverpool were pretty close to our numbers for distance and sprints.
Very difficult to get anything out of it, when there's no context. Avg. Per 90? For what? For the whole squad? Per player? Or maybe total for the whole team, diveded per player that has played, and then averaged over 90 minutes?
Impossible to make anything out of it without context.
 
Those stats do not correspond with other stats posted here, where Liverpool were pretty close to our numbers for distance and sprints.
Those figures posted a few pages back were from this BBC article following week 6 of the season, back when Slot was gradually getting Klopp's players accustomed to a new brand of football.

Hopefully there's a full breakdown of these figures in the new year, as they don't appear to be available on usual sites for public to see.


Screenshot_20250103_224517_BBC Sport.jpgScreenshot_20250103_225009_BBC Sport.jpg
 
Those stats do not correspond with other stats posted here, where Liverpool were pretty close to our numbers for distance and sprints.
Very difficult to get anything out of it, when there's no context. Avg. Per 90? For what? For the whole squad? Per player? Or maybe total for the whole team, diveded per player that has played, and then averaged over 90 minutes?
Impossible to make anything out of it without context.

FWIW this was following week 11 of this season.


Liverpool are also learning how to become more efficient with their use of energy. Klopp was a manager who demanded incredible levels of intensity from his players, both in and out of possession, but his replacement has stripped that back a bit.

The Reds cover less distance under Slot, who prefers more of a mid-pitch block than the high press that was so synonymous with his German predecessor. Defending from the front is important for all teams, but Liverpool’s press is not as regular or fervent as it was, with their number of pressed sequences per 90 minutes dropping sharply.

A measure of pressing intensity, PPDA is calculated as follows: the number of passes completed by the opposition divided by the number of defensive actions by the out-of-possession team (defensive actions are interceptions, successful tackles, attempted tackles and fouls) Last season their average of 15.8 was the highest in the Premier League, but as it stands they are ranked joint-11th, with 11.5 per 90.

IMG_4462.jpeg
 
A measure of pressing intensity, PPDA is calculated as follows: the number of passes completed by the opposition divided by the number of defensive actions by the out-of-possession team (defensive actions are interceptions, successful tackles, attempted tackles and fouls) Last season their average of 15.8 was the highest in the Premier League, but as it stands they are ranked joint-11th, with 11.5 per 90.
I'm confused, they mention PPDA of 15.8 being great (1st) and 11.5 being meh (11th).
Then the table they show has PPDA of 8 being great (2nd) and 10.8 being very good (4th).

So what is a good number here... is it 15.8 or 8?
And actually are we saying PPDA for yourselves should be low (you don't allow the oppo to pass) whereas PPDA for your opposition should be high.. or vice versa... is there PPDA for yourselves and PPDA for opponents???
 
I'm confused, they mention PPDA of 15.8 being great (1st) and 11.5 being meh (11th).
Then the table they show has PPDA of 8 being great (2nd) and 10.8 being very good (4th).

So what is a good number here... is it 15.8 or 8?
And actually are we saying PPDA for yourselves should be low (you don't allow the oppo to pass) whereas PPDA for your opposition should be high.. or vice versa... is there PPDA for yourselves and PPDA for opponents???

Hmmm, guess whomever penned that article missed out some text in that paragraph which should differentiate between Klopp’s low number of PPDA permitted and the high amount PS per game vs Slot this season.

PPDA – Passes Allowed per Defensive Action
PPDA is the number of opposition passes allowed outside of the pressing team’s own defensive third, divided by the number of defensive actions by the pressing team outside of their own defensive third. In our PPDA calculation, the defensive actions are fouls, tackles, interceptions, challenges, and blocked passes.

Pressed Sequences
The number of open-play sequences starting in their defensive third where the opposition has three or fewer passes, and the sequence ends in their own half.

We’re top of this season’s PPDA table with a figure of 8.6 before the Bournemouth game (they’re in 7th with 11.2 PPDA) but I cannot find a more recent set of figures for us.


This is the PPDA table from the end of 2023/24 season.
IMG_4465.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Looks like Slot has ratcheted down their sprinting since the start of the season, to compensate for having some older players in the squad who cannot gegenpress like they used to back in Klopp’s heyday.


Liverpool are devastating on the counter but the way they play is not dissimilar to the way they played under Klopp. They pass it round the outside of the box, get it to Trent and he whips a ball into the back post. They have runners in the back post knowing Trent and Robinson will find them and if the balls loose they have players in the box to tap it in.
 
Re Liverpool, I'd think it's a bit of both. Not having injuries to start with, having a fairly big squad of good players, which means you CAN rotate, and luck.
We had a few injured at the start of the season, Odobert arrived late, Solanke got injured pretty much straight away etc.

You have to have some stability to rotate from. Going forward - now - I think we will be able to rotate a lot more. It takes time. That is the thing fans simply don’t appreciate.
 
Back