-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Ingerlund
- Thread starter Danishfurniturelover
- Start date
Rorschach
Sonny Walters
He was. They are talking about that on my commentary.
Yiddo
Jack Jull
Looked like it.
FolkestoneSpur
Neil Sullivan
50!!!
FolkestoneSpur
Neil Sullivan
No idea why they didn't look at that.
Well off, terrible decision
yiddo37
Didier Zokora
Think because of the deflection off the German player Kane became onside
AuroRaman
Chris Armstrong
Was there a deflection or the ball wasn’t intended for him? It looked nailed on.
FolkestoneSpur
Neil Sullivan
Channel 4 not even mentioned it.
Defender has to play the ball, deflection doesn't matter
FolkestoneSpur
Neil Sullivan
That's the only thing it could have been.
FolkestoneSpur
Neil Sullivan
Yes but if he's played it and miss kicked
The ball has to be intentionally played now. It's the bollox that they gave for Reals disallowed goal in the CL final.
yiddo37
Didier Zokora
Does it? I really don't know anymore, all guesswork.
The Real one I thought was a goal all day thinking a Liverpool player had played the ball but on closer inspection a Real player had just toe poked the ball forward before the challenge.
Didnt have the benefit of commentary as the pub was packed and loud so don't know the official reasoning
Bounced off 3 Liverpool players, last one slid into ball, was intentional all day long. This one wasn't, not even sure if it hit the German player