Is it fashionable to not acknowledge that the guy has scored three times for us so far? Appreciate that Sterling hasn't been perfect but can you argue with the impact he's had this tournament.
Also, wish the pundits would get the memo that we're playing Ukraine, not "the Ukraine" having left the USSR a while ago.
Scored three and ruined 300 scoring opportunities.
3 tap ins from inside the six yard box, chances even Lukaku wouldn’t miss.
They do, and so would all the ones Kane would have scored if Sterling could pass.As long as you're enjoying your ignorance then it's fine by my I guess. Goals count the same wherever they're scored from the last time I heard.
I assume Southgate's told him to pass or be replaced by someone with silly hair.Great assist. Credit where its due
They do, and so would all the ones Kane would have scored if Sterling could pass.
Great assist. Credit where its due
Sorry you were saying?
What he said.His first completed pass of the tournament and England score from it.
Will the penny drop?
What he said.
He'd have done at least as well as Sterling up until this match - 0 assists attempted to the best striker in the tournament.It's legitimately incorrect but I guess you reckon Sissoko would have done better now. That's actually too funny and it makes it better that you and Baleforce won't hold your hands up there....Top stuff.
He'd have done at least as well as Sterling up until this match - 0 assists attempted to the best striker in the tournament.
If Southgate has managed to get him to stop staring at his laces and accept Kane will always have a better chance of scoring then I'm comfortable with him playing.
If Sterling hadn't been running into blind alleys, someone would have given the ball to Kane who would have scored a lot more than 3.You forgot the three goals again! I'm here to help.