VAR did a good job there, and pretty quickly too.
Yeah I think he's a little unlucky. He didn't break stride or attempt a tackle. The Italian's foot was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.A pen for that?
Southgate has got some of our approach play looking half decent.
BUT it's glaringly obvious where it is all gonna fall down.
Agreed, Tarkowski was running in a straight line, whilst Chiesa played it off his left foot then his right in an awkward place and was already falling as the ball went off the pitch... and Tarkowski just carried on running.Yeah I think he's a little unlucky. He didn't break stride or attempt a tackle. The Italian's foot was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
If Kane was playing for Italy in the first half, we'd of been 3 down.Enlighten us!
Fixed, you're welcomeLallana is way offfitnessinternational standard which isa shamefunny
I think the back 3 makes sense given we don't have two centre backs good enough to form a back two.
We could play with two and Dier dropping in, freeing up another midfield berth. I'm more of a fan of two box to box midfielders in there with a back three.
Tonight we got lucky with the three man midfield. A better team would've overloaded the flanks more, we were weak there.
Another question would be whether Kane fits this side. The constant running from the front players was a key feature these last two games and Kane isn't of that mould. The same with Dele, who I could only see in a deeper role in this side.
I say this having not watched the match tonight, but Kane runs his nuts off and Dele can play from deep if needed?
If Kane was playing for Italy in the first half, we'd of been 3 down.
Fixed, you're welcome
FixedI'm a taco