spurspinter1
Pat van den Hauwe
I know human nature - anyone who understands it can tell you that enough people will never make their lives worse for some possible benefit that they may never receive due to much of the rest of the world not doing their bit. Do you genuinely think people will stop flying, stop eating meat, live in colder houses etc? Look where there have been gains - EVs are about 80-90% as good as real cars and so people are buying them, lab-grown meat apparently is indistinguishable from the real thing - people will eat that when technology makes it readily available. But tell people to holiday in the UK and not Monaco and they'll tell you to fudge off.
The hedonism bit is quite simple - you only get around a decade to do it properly without being a weird, old person. That's a one-off chance to spend 10 years getting completely off your tits, sleeping around and being completely irresponsible whilst doing little but chasing pleasure. You can't care loudly about brick, being entirely boring until you're 25 and then do the young person bit - it doesn't work that way around. You have to do that bit from your early-mid teens until your early-mid 20s - not doing that is wasting the most valuable resource any of us has. Problem is, the current generation of buzzkillers won't realise that until they've wasted it.
Who has said that people need to live in colder houses!? Absurd strawman. The current system is making people live in cold houses because a conflict in Ukraine spiked the prices and many can't afford heating, if governments were more proactive about not relying on fossil fuels it wouldn't be a problem. Already I'm gauging that you're not aware of the issues with how things currently are, whilst pretending things would be worse doing anything else.
As for not eating meat, plenty of people don't and it's not some new fangled idea. Life isn't worse by not consuming the flesh of what were sentient beings. You very well might be the kind of bloke who bases 40% of their personality around bacon but others have realized there's other ways and also realized who will be on the right side of history on that one. It might take lab based meat to sway you but others have already made a change, even if it's just reducing meat consumption via some like meat free Thursdays or whatever.
Regarding cars, the people that refuse the notion of EVs because petrol cars are a large part of their identity and are presumably desperate to suck off Jeremy Clarkson or any other top gear folk are a small portion of the population. Not everyone is the same, some people are actually considerate beyond their own likes / dislikes or convenience with no consideration of the impact, that idea seems to escape you, much like empathy does.
Flying wise, much like cars if we focus on it we'll find a more efficient way to do it but I do appreciate that many would not want to move away from the convenience of it within the pressures of today's life. 2 hour flight including a nightmare airport trip to Istanbul or a leisurely 4/5 day trip on a continental train stopping off at places on the way, there are ways to do things if we stop pretending to be in a rush.
As for the whole last paragraph, again I'll ask, what credentials do you have to be telling other people how to live their lives? There might be some projecting / envy going on there. You're indicating that you're irritated by Greta campaigning for change in climate policy by labelling it as virtue signalling and would be happier if she spent the time sleeping around whilst off her tits because she is young, does that view sound odd at all when it's recited back to you?
Last edited: