What is your problem with him Kd?
With him? nothing but i think i have a problem with the people that like to overrate his performances to such a ridiculous level when he had nothing to do. He was solid yesterday so a 6.5/7 rating is about right (bar the miscommunication with him and Caulker again).
With him? nothing but i think i have a problem with the people that like to overrate his performances to such a ridiculous level when he had nothing to do. He was solid yesterday so a 6.5/7 rating is about right (bar the miscommunication with him and Caulker again).
A combination of him and Caulker nearly cost us a goal again.
I think giving him 6.5 is under rating and I don't think 9 is overrating a superb display of keeping that he gave, again.With him? nothing but i think i have a problem with the people that like to overrate his performances to such a ridiculous level when he had nothing to do. He was solid yesterday so a 6.5/7 rating is about right (bar the miscommunication with him and Caulker again).
Fair enough I don't remember that, but I take your word for it. It might take a while for other players to realise we have a keeper who commands his area unlike Brad, and let Hugo be the Boss that he is.
I think giving him 6.5 is under rating and I don't think 9 is overrating a superb display of keeping that he gave, again.
With him? nothing but i think i have a problem with the people that like to overrate his performances to such a ridiculous level when he had nothing to do. He was solid yesterday so a 6.5/7 rating is about right (bar the miscommunication with him and Caulker again).
Saying Lloris was superb is giving the impression that Stoke hammered us and that Lloris was a one man barrier
didn't have much to do 'on the ball' ie making saves - but his distribution was great i thought, often setting up some quick attacks and picking out the front players with long kicks. was strong in the air claiming crosses - can certainly see why some will give him higher than a 7.
what does it really matter anyway if people over rate him? seems a pointless task to pick up on every comment you deem to be over the top, if you ask me and is just furthering what has become a rather tedious Lloris/Friedel debate
a general question here - can a goalkeeper only have a 'superb' performance if he has a lot of saves to make?
think it's interesting that GKs seemingly only get rated on one aspect of their game, well only attributed positively by the saves they make - if a GK was flapping at crosses, failing to close down and having sloppy distribution id imaging he'd get marked down for that, but you are less likely to see positive scores when they do well in those areas
I think giving him 6.5 is under rating and I don't think 9 is overrating a superb display of keeping that he gave, again.
Fair enough I don't remember that, but I take your word for it. It might take a while for other players to realise we have a keeper who commands his area unlike Brad, and let Hugo be the Boss that he is.
more often than not yes, or if he is heavily involved in build up..and by heavily i mean to the level of vorm on some occasions or valdes for barca or reina on occasion for liverpool..and it has to be noticeable.....then there are others things like judgement and positioning being displayed REGULARLY.
if you dont have much to do then you cannot be superb...i dont see the logic in being amazing when you dont do superb or amazing things
more often than not yes, or if he is heavily involved in build up..and by heavily i mean to the level of vorm on some occasions or valdes for barca or reina on occasion for liverpool..and it has to be noticeable.....then there are others things like judgement and positioning being displayed REGULARLY.
if you dont have much to do then you cannot be superb...i dont see the logic in being amazing when you dont do superb or amazing things
a general question here - can a goalkeeper only have a 'superb' performance if he has a lot of saves to make?
think it's interesting that GKs seemingly only get rated on one aspect of their game, well only attributed positively by the saves they make - if a GK was flapping at crosses, failing to close down and having sloppy distribution id imaging he'd get marked down for that, but you are less likely to see positive scores when they do well in those areas