are the non-footballing businesses contributing to the footballing finances yet?
What do you mean by non-footballing businesses?
are the non-footballing businesses contributing to the footballing finances yet?
Purple and Gold my dear fellowWhat do you mean by non-footballing businesses?
Entertainment and events...concerts , go kart, roof walk etc.What do you mean by non-footballing businesses?
Entertainment and events...concerts , go kart, roof walk etc.
The 55% wages to turnover ratio includes all club employees, whereas I believe that FFP calculations are based on first team playing and coaching squad wage bill only. I think that a total wage to revenue ratio of 55% would leave somewhat more than £75m due to this factor.It's just if 55% of turnover is wages. That leaves 15% for amortisation and agents fees. £75m from a £500m turnover. Or 10 players on 5 year contracts, that were bought for £37.5m. (Not including agents fees). The average cost of a player in the squad would have to be £15m.
That's not buying new. That's what we have.
That’s been going back into the club all a longEntertainment and events...concerts , go kart, roof walk etc.
I know but I just want to know when all the additional effort pays off and there's more funds for football stuffThat’s been going back into the club all a long
So far… the owners haven’t taken anything out of the club from the accounts at least
Well we’re spending more and more each yearI
I know but I just want to know when all the additional effort pays off and there's more funds for football stuff
It sounds like you know?I
I know but I just want to know when all the additional effort pays off and there's more funds for football stuff
I’m sure I read Kieron Maguire say agents fees are included in that calc as you describeThe 55% wages to turnover ratio includes all club employees, whereas I believe that FFP calculations are based on first team playing and coaching squad wage bill only. I think that a total wage to revenue ratio of 55% would leave somewhat more than £75m due to this factor.
Something I'm not aware of is how agents fees are factored in for FFP calculations. I think (though haven't specifically gone to check) that in our accounts the agents fees are included in the cost of the transfer (i.e. if a player is signed for £40m that includes the transfer and agents fees combined). If that is the case then it would probably make sense for that entire amount (transfer and agents fees) to be amortised over the length of the player contract.
I
I know but I just want to know when all the additional effort pays off and there's more funds for football stuff
We’re one of the biggest spending clubs in all of Europe. Something we couldn’t say when we were at WHLI
I know but I just want to know when all the additional effort pays off and there's more funds for football stuff
Also about player salaries. We have to be spending more than Arsenal in transfers and salaries. Don't forget Levy is the highest paid chairman and has made probably a billion or so for himself already. We've got good revenue but transfers and wages lag.
Why do we have to be spending more on arsenal on wages and saleries? Chelsea and utd spend far more than we do. Yet we finished higher.
Ignore arsenal if you want, but there is a positive correlation between high wages and topping whichever industry you are in. There will be exceptions but it will always revert to the norm. i.e. like once in a blue moon Leicester. Man U, Liverpool, Real etc say otherwise
United are the showcase of why that measure doesn’t workIgnore arsenal if you want, but there is a positive correlation between high wages and topping whichever industry you are in. There will be exceptions but it will always revert to the norm. i.e. like once in a blue moon Leicester. Man U, Liverpool, Real etc say otherwise